Chemistry Beer Lambert problem, where did I go wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Valenti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beer
Valenti
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Light intensity decreases by a factor of 100 when light passes through a 1cm cuvette with solution. Molar extinction coefficient is 105M-1cm-1. Find concentration.
Relevant Equations
A=ECL
A = log(io/I)
A=ECL
A = log(io/I)
A = log100/1 = 2

2/105M(1cm) = 0.019M ~ 20mM

Apparently the answer is 2mM, where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer looks right to me, assuming you have copied the question correctly.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top