Bee's new paper on QG phenomenology

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper Phenomenology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Bee's paper on Quantum Gravity (QG) phenomenology, presented at the SUSY 06 conference in June, contains a critical passage that has generated discussion regarding its linguistic clarity. The passage in question suggests that the wave-vector k will not transform as a standard Lorentz-vector and will obey the Modified Dispersion Relation (MDR). However, the phrasing has led to confusion, with interpretations suggesting the opposite meaning. The discussion emphasizes the importance of precise language in scientific communication, particularly in complex fields like quantum gravity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Gravity concepts
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Knowledge of Modified Dispersion Relations (MDR)
  • Basic comprehension of Feynman diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Read the full paper "Phenomenological Quantum Gravity" by S. Hossenfelder on arXiv
  • Study the implications of Modified Dispersion Relations in quantum gravity
  • Explore the role of linguistic clarity in scientific writing
  • Investigate the relationship between particle physics and general relativity at the Planck scale
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on quantum gravity, linguists in scientific communication, and attendees of the SUSY 06 conference will benefit from this discussion.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
It's a good paper. She delivered it in June at the Irvine SUSY 06 conference but we didnt get to see it until now.

It has a confusing passage on page 2, at the bottom, right before the Feynman diagram on page 3.
===quote===

In contrast to the asymptotic momenta p, the wave-vector k of the particle in the interaction region will behave non-trivially because strong gravitational effects disturb the propagation of the wave. In particular, it will not transform as a standard (flat space) Lorentz-vector, and obey the MDR.

===endquote===
I suppose the intended meaning is " In particular, it will not transform as a standard (flat space) Lorentz-vector, but* WILL INSTEAD obey the MDR."

As an English speaker the literal meaning I get is opposite to this:
" In particular, it will not transform as a standard (flat space) Lorentz-vector, and (also will not) obey the MDR."

In any case there is some linguistic ambiguity.

Here is the paper:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0611017
Phenomenological Quantum Gravity
S. Hossenfelder
To appear in Proceedings of SUSY06, the 14th International Conference on Supersymmetry and the Unification of Fundamental Interactions, UC Irvine, California, 12-17 June 2006

"Planck scale physics represents a future challenge, located between particle physics and general relativity. The Planck scale marks a threshold beyond which the old description of spacetime breaks down and conceptually new phenomena must appear. In the last years, increased efforts have been made to examine the phenomenology of quantum gravity, even if the full theory is still unknown."

[EDIT] selfAdjoint suggested saying "but" and I adopted that and edited it in. See his next post.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Marcus (from Bee's paper) said:
In particular, it will not transform as a standard (flat space) Lorentz-vector, and obey the MDR.

Right, I think the sentence will read as she intended if we replace the "and" with a "but".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
11K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
16K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K