Being a good theoretical physicist

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the aspirations and challenges faced by a high school student interested in becoming a theoretical physicist. It explores the student's feelings of inadequacy in generating original ideas and the necessary knowledge base for creative thinking in physics and mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster expresses a desire to find alternatives to quantum mechanics and feels they lack originality in thinking.
  • Some participants suggest that the ability to think creatively in physics requires a solid foundational knowledge, which the student may not yet possess due to their current educational level.
  • One participant reassures the student that feeling overwhelmed is common and emphasizes the importance of deepening knowledge before expecting to generate original ideas.
  • Another participant shares a resource link related to theoretical physics, indicating a willingness to support the student's learning journey.
  • A follow-up comment expresses gratitude for the shared resource and requests similar resources for chemistry, indicating a broader interest in STEM fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that foundational knowledge is crucial for developing original ideas in theoretical physics. However, there is no consensus on the student's perceived limitations or the timeline for developing creative thinking skills.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects the student's current educational stage and the associated challenges of transitioning from learning basic concepts to engaging in original research or theoretical development.

Who May Find This Useful

High school students interested in theoretical physics, educators providing guidance to aspiring physicists, and individuals seeking resources for foundational knowledge in physics and mathematics.

jobsism
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. I'm a 11th grader who plans on becoming a theoretical physicist. In fact, for most of the time, the only thing that goes in my head is trying to think of an idea to find a better alternative to quantum mechanics, as I feel that it is not in accordance with nature.

I have the passion for physics, but I feel that I can't think in my own original ways, which i hear is very necessary for a theoretical physicist. I can't think of ideas for problems in physics, and tend to give up easily. I am in love with maths too, and I like trying some of the unsolved problems in maths like the Riemann hypothesis, abc conjecture, but I don't think very well on my own, and have to browse somewhere soon for ideas that others have tried for solving them.

I want to know if I can ever be a good theoretical physicist, with this bad trait. Please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jobsism said:
I have the passion for physics, but I feel that I can't think in my own original ways, which i hear is very necessary for a theoretical physicist. I can't think of ideas for problems in physics, and tend to give up easily.
I'll just comment on this, and let the others more in the know give you advice as to your wish of being a theoretical physicist. Of couse you can't think of ideas of problems in physics in an original way, you're in grade 11! Unless you've got ample amounts of knowledge of the field, you're not supposed to be able to think of new stuff. No one can be creative when they don't know enough about the field they're studying, because you have to know the basics first and *then* you can make new conjectures or whatnot. This isn't just physics, it applies to everything. A lot of things seem scary at first glance, and you can't imagine solving specific problems or coming up with new ideas when you first encounter the material, but when you delve deeper into it, you can process that consolidated knowledge and make inferences that are impossible without actually having that knowledge. How can you make a connection between two things you don't know of or know very little about? So don't let this discourage you (not just as far as physics is concerned).
 
Thank you, Ryker! I guess I was just being impatient..thanks for knocking some sense into me! :D
 
chiro said:
Hey Jobsism, you may want to take a look at this:

http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/theorist.html

I love you for sharing this. Thank you so much; you don't happen to know of a similar website with chemistry resources instead, no? : D
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K