Undergrad Bell's theorem : pre- and post-digitization

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the CHSH version of Bell's theorem, which involves digitization to yield integer results from measurements that can take values of 1 and -1. Participants question whether digitizing after summation could lead to higher results by altering the values subtracted during calculations. The conversation calls for a detailed explanation of the digitization process, specifically outlining the mathematical steps involved. Additionally, there is a request for references to support the explanation of the CHSH version of Bell's theorem. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of clarity in mathematical processes related to digitization in quantum mechanics.
jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
The CHSH version of Bell's theorem uses a digitization to obtain integer results in the set made of 1,-1, and then sums 4 of them.

Could it be that digitizing after the sum gives a higher result since for example instead of subtracting 1 one would subtract only .2 for example ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk22 said:
The CHSH version of Bell's theorem uses a digitization

How? Please describe specifically what "digitization" you think is going on (where "specifically" means "point out the explicit steps in the math"). And please give a specific reference for where you are getting your description of the CHSH version of Bell's Theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
8K
  • · Replies 220 ·
8
Replies
220
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
7K