Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following textbook Heisenberg's Quantum Mechanics shows an example of calculating Berry's curvature (top page on pg 518). It led to a following equation

V_{m}= (- 1/B^{2}) * i *∑ ( <m,B|S|n,B> ∧ <n,B|S|m,B> ) / A^{2}................[1]

the textbook claims that we add the term m = n since <m|S|m> ∧ <m|S|m> = 0 then the above equation simplifies to

V_{m}= (- 1/B^{2}) * i * ∑( <m,B|S ∧ S|n,B> ) / A^{2}.................[2]

The symbol ∧ stands for 'and' in logic or cross product.

My question is how the author derived that claim and how it led to that equation [2] from equation [1] ?

My reasoning is that |n,B> 'and' <n,B| are both true therefore ( |n,B> 'and' <n,B|) = 1 which is equal to 1 'and' 1 however I do not believe that my reasoning is a valid one. What is the alternative to this?

Thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Berry's Curvature Equation cross product calculation

Tags:

Loading...

Similar Threads - Berry's Curvature Equation | Date |
---|---|

A Berry phase and parallel transport | Jan 6, 2018 |

A Is the Berry connection compatible with the metric? | Jan 2, 2018 |

I Berry phase, Bra-Ket and gradient | Nov 2, 2017 |

I Defining exchange statistics of anyons in terms of Berry phase | Mar 17, 2017 |

I Berry connection | Nov 30, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**