Best Acceleration (Ergonomically)

  • Thread starter Thread starter robinfisichel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of an acceleration curve for a lightweight electric car, focusing on how acceleration should feel during the initial phase and up to the maximum speed. Participants explore the implications of acceleration metrics like 0-60 mph and the factors that influence acceleration performance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is designing an electric car and seeks input on an acceleration curve, suggesting that the greatest acceleration should occur in the first few seconds and then decrease.
  • Another participant questions whether knowing the 0-60 mph time already provides an acceleration curve, implying a potential misunderstanding of the initial inquiry.
  • Some participants argue that more acceleration is inherently better, but emphasize that initial acceleration is often traction-limited, while later acceleration becomes power-limited.
  • There is a contention that the 0-60 mph metric is not a practical measure of real-world performance, with suggestions that acceleration from normal speeds to motorway speeds is more relevant.
  • One participant expresses confusion about throttle mapping, indicating that maximum performance is desired early on without unexpected spikes in acceleration at higher speeds.
  • Another participant clarifies that acceleration is determined by torque output and discusses the importance of engine revs and gear ratios in relation to acceleration performance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relevance of the 0-60 mph metric and the nature of acceleration curves, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the initial acceleration is influenced by traction and that the design of the acceleration curve may depend on various factors such as engine characteristics and throttle mapping. There is also mention of the limitations of using 0-60 mph as a performance measure.

robinfisichel
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Im trying to spec the acceleration curve (vs time) for a car i am designing in a project. The car is lightweight (400 kilos) low drag (cd=0.15) and electric (also only one forward gear).

Im trying to come up with what would 'feel' like a good acceleration.
0-60mph is about 9-10 seconds.
Top speed around 100mph

Would most people agree that the 'kick' or greatest acceleration should happen in the first few seconds and then progressively decrease up to the max speed?

If anyone has some accel data logs from a slowish passenger car (both electric and non electric) that would be useful...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
apologies if I've misunderstood this... but if you already know what the 0-60mph time is, don't you already have a accn curve?
 
Seems like a pointless excerise to me.

More acceleration = better...

Fact is you won't be able to alter 'when' the kick comes in as that determined by the engine, gearing, mass and traction available. Basically no matter what you do, the inital acceleration is likely to be traction limited, then as you get going it'll be power limited.

No matter what you do the biggest 'push' will come at peak torque in gear. There is very little you can do to alter that.

AS an asside 0-60 is a totally pointless measure of real world performance, simply because no one does it. 30/40 - 70 is a fer better target to aim for. (Basically acceleration from normal speed to motorway speeds)
 
xxChrisxx said:
Seems like a pointless excerise to me.

More acceleration = better...

Fact is you won't be able to alter 'when' the kick comes in as that determined by the engine, gearing, mass and traction available. Basically no matter what you do, the inital acceleration is likely to be traction limited, then as you get going it'll be power limited.

No matter what you do the biggest 'push' will come at peak torque in gear. There is very little you can do to alter that.

AS an asside 0-60 is a totally pointless measure of real world performance, simply because no one does it. 30/40 - 70 is a fer better target to aim for. (Basically acceleration from normal speed to motorway speeds)

actually i think i have confused myself, my question is probably more to do with throttle mapping, more acceleration = better only if you are putting your pedal to the floor (i.e. want the max performance) though you would want that acceleration early on (you don't want some sort of huge spike at 50mph as its not really expected).
 
More acceleration is ALWAYS better :)

I must agree with xxChrisxx's aside about the 0-60. While it does tell you something about the car because in general, a better 0-60 means better 30-70, this is not always the case. I've actually seen manufacturers deliberately decrease the overall performance of their cars, simply because it resulted in a better 0-60 time...and that defeats the very point of the measurement.
 
robinfisichel said:
actually i think i have confused myself, my question is probably more to do with throttle mapping, more acceleration = better only if you are putting your pedal to the floor (i.e. want the max performance) though you would want that acceleration early on (you don't want some sort of huge spike at 50mph as its not really expected).

There's no way you would ever get a 'spike' of acceleration. As acceleration is determined by the torque output of the engine, so unless you had a very large spike in the torque speak you wouldn't get a large sudden rush of acceleration.

In general with cars as opposed to thinking strictly in terms of speeds, it's better to just think in terms of engine revs and gear ratios.

eg. you say you don't want a huge spike at 50mph. You may do, if I put my foot down in 3rd i'd expect some performance. however if I was in top gear, I wouldn't expect to accelerate at all. In the 3rd gear case, you'd be running between peak torque and peak power. In top gear you'd be at low revs.

For thottle mapping you generally want it mapped against load and speed, to be honest my mate is the one to talk to on this as ECU's are just magic little boxes to me.

However in general, at low load and WOT you want lots and lots of fuel being injected (read slightly rich). As that generally signifies that you are traveling slowly and want to get a move on. At high load (speed) and WOT, you want to lean the engine out for good fuel economy. Ie motorway cruising at peak efficiency.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K