Best all time mathematicians/physicists.

  • Thread starter Thread starter mprm86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around participants' opinions on who they consider the best mathematicians and physicists of all time. The scope includes historical figures and their contributions to mathematics and physics, with a focus on personal preferences rather than a definitive ranking.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants list their top mathematicians and physicists, including names like Einstein, Gauss, Newton, Euler, Archimedes, Riemann, and others.
  • One participant expresses a preference for Riemann, highlighting his contributions to algebraic geometry and complex analysis.
  • Another participant questions the inclusion of Erdős in the list, suggesting that his work may not be as significant as others mentioned.
  • There are multiple mentions of Archimedes, with one participant arguing for his top position based on the significance of his works.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about their knowledge of physics, suggesting that Nobel Prize winners could be a reference for notable physicists.
  • Discussion includes a critique of Ptolemy's geocentric model and a defense of his rational arguments against modern insights.
  • Several participants note the importance of context and personal familiarity with the works of the mathematicians and physicists they mention.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on who the best mathematicians and physicists are, with various competing views and preferences expressed throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal biases and familiarity with certain mathematicians' works, which may affect the perceived importance of their contributions. The discussion also highlights the subjective nature of ranking historical figures in mathematics and physics.

  • #181
mathwonk said:
just to be annoying, i will suggest that if you mention someone, you should have actually read at least some of their own writings. if not, then perhaps, just perhaps, you do not know what you are talking about.

thanks mathwonk, you have been an inspiration throughout this entire thread. I honestly read through practically the entire thread several times and at disperse instances just because of the quality of your posts.

and to Outlined, only dead ones count in the debate of greatest of all time, I just wanted to incite a dicussion about Perelman and the current developments in topology. This is not yet my area of focus, but I plan on getting around to it, currently studying prime numbers and set theory. I need to study the geometrization conjecture a bit more, although I believe I understand the fundamental principles of topology.

Mathwonk, speaking of reading the masters in their own words, I was reading Riemann's 1859 paper (calling it that for lack of will to recall the German name), and I was wondering if you could recommend a good book in complex analysis specific for understanding the jump he made in end of page 2 and page 3 to derive the functional equation. Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #182
Newton, Einstein, Gauss, Euler, Neumann, Feynman, Kelvin, Turing, Maxwell, Galilei, Hilbert, Poincaré, Majorana, Landau, Dirac, Faraday, Pedro Nunes (I'm portuguese), etc.
 
  • #183
some more that I thought should be mentioned.
Gibbs, Boltzmann, Tesla, Wheeler, Hugh Everett,Eugene Wigner
 
Last edited:
  • #184
Pythagoras and Descartes
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K