Beta function of electroweak theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the electroweak beta function in the context of quantum field theory (QFT), specifically at one-loop level. Participants reference key papers, including arXiv:hep-ph/9807548 and arXiv:hep-ph/0412163v2, which provide insights into the running of electroweak couplings. The beta function parameters for the Standard Model (SM) at 173 GeV are identified as b1 = 41/6 and b2 = -19/6, derived from the contributions of 12 Weyl fermions and 1 scalar. The discussion concludes that altering the particle content is necessary to explore asymptotic freedom in the electroweak sector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Field Theory (QFT) fundamentals
  • Understanding of the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics
  • Familiarity with beta functions and running couplings
  • Knowledge of spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the beta function in non-abelian gauge theories
  • Examine the running of couplings in the Standard Model using arXiv:hep-ph/0412163v2
  • Research the effects of new particles on the beta function and asymptotic freedom
  • Explore the role of spontaneous symmetry breaking in electroweak interactions
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, theoretical physicists, and researchers interested in quantum field theory and the electroweak sector of the Standard Model.

Sleuth
Messages
46
Reaction score
4
Hi everyone,

I have another (probably too) simple question for particle physicists on this forum, but I often realize that my understanding of QFT is still rather poor.

Do you know where I can find the electroweak beta function explicitly written down (at one-loop, of course)?
I would like to have a look at the explicit expression for it. The reason is that, as it's well known, non-abelian theories can be asymptotically free. But then, what about SU(2)xU(1) with SSB, i.e. the ew sector of the standard model? Is there a choice of parameters for which the electroweak interactions would become asymptotically free? Or does the SSB mechanism make this impossible?

Thanks!
Sleuth
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wonder, was the question below everyones' dignity ? xD
 
I wonder if anyone will answer the question now. Most people do not react well to "My servants! Attend me!"
 
Ehm... people do take themselves too seriously sometimes :) i was just making a joke. I thought the question would really be too stupid. Take it easy; ) i guess asking physics questions over Christmas is not the best thing someone can do :D
 
Thanks Hepth! The paper looks like it goes in the right direction. Going through it fast I haven't found a precise quantitative statement on the running of the ew couplings, but maybe I should take some time to read it more carefully!

Thanks
 
Hi Sleuth,

I hope you find the following interesting:

Please look at http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0412163v2.pdf.

Equation 2 is the general equation for the running coupling, and the relevant parameter is the b_i piece given in equation 3.

If you compute this for the SM(at 173 GeV) you find
b1=41/6 and b2 = -19/6.

b2 is for example coming from 12 Weyl fermions, 1 scalar, C_2(G) = 2 for SU(2), and T_R(I) = 1/2. So, if you want s_w(mu)^2 or something, you can compute 1/(1+alpha(b1,mu)/alpha(b2,mu)).

On the other hand, if you want to flip the signs etc. of the running beyond some high energy scales etc. where new particles might be living, you have to change the particle content (consistently) and compute the running of the beta functions under these conditions.

Hope this helps.

Edit, added scale at which the SM content gives those values. I believe it includes the top quark.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
995
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
795
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K