Beta functions and relevant/irrelevant operators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the conceptual understanding of beta functions and the classification of operators as relevant, marginally relevant, irrelevant, or marginally irrelevant within quantum field theory. The specific example provided involves the beta function for the coupling constant g_s, expressed as \(\frac{dg^2_s}{d\ln M} = -\frac{14}{16\pi^2}g^4_s\), indicating asymptotic freedom as the scale M increases. The confusion arises in distinguishing between marginally relevant and relevant operators, particularly in the context of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) versus Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beta functions in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with coupling constants and their behavior under renormalization
  • Knowledge of relevant, marginally relevant, irrelevant, and marginally irrelevant operators
  • Basic principles of asymptotic freedom in quantum field theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of beta functions in quantum field theories
  • Explore the differences between relevant and marginally relevant operators in detail
  • Investigate the renormalization group flow and its impact on coupling constants
  • Examine case studies of QED and QCD to illustrate the concepts of relevance in physical theories
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, theoretical physicists, and students in quantum field theory seeking to deepen their understanding of operator classification and beta function behavior in particle physics.

eherrtelle59
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Ok, I'm having some conceptual difficulty here. When discussing beta functions and the relation how these differential equations flow, I still don't quite get the difference between relevant vs. marginally relevant and irrelevant vs. marginally irrelevant.

For instance, take the β function with coupling g_s

\frac{dg^2_s}{d\ln M} = -\frac{14}{16\pi^2}g^4_s

The solution is \frac{1}{g^2_s}=\frac{14}{16\pi^2} \ln(M/M')
such that the theory diverges at M'. The theory's obviously asymptotically free, as when the scale M grows, the coupling g_s decreases.

So, since the beta function is negative, I know this is either irrelevant or marginally irrelevant. What's the difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I'm wrong above.

At lower and lower energy scales M, g becomes larger and larger and therefore relevant. Why is it marginally relevant instead of relevant?
 
In case I'm being to obscure above, let's just work with QED vs. QCD.

How do you know these theories are marginally (ir)relevant as opposed to (ir)relevant?

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K