Bidmas (brackets; indices; divide/multiply; add/subtract)

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cliff Hanley
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 2K views
Cliff Hanley
Messages
90
Reaction score
2
I've just come across an example of this on the following website; http://www.bbc.co.uk/education/guides/zqn3r82/revision/5

The example was;

[40 - (2+4^2)] x 2

The site said that if there are two sets of brackets calculate the inside brackets first. I proceeded as follows;

inside brackets; 2+4^2 = 2+ 4x4 = 2+16 = 18

then the outer brackets; 40 - 18 = 22

then the last part; 22 x 2 = 44

But the site gave 8 as the answer. Any idea where I'm going wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cliff Hanley said:
I've just come across an example of this on the following website; http://www.bbc.co.uk/education/guides/zqn3r82/revision/5

The example was;

[40 - (2+4^2)] x 2

The site said that if there are two sets of brackets calculate the inside brackets first. I proceeded as follows;

inside brackets; 2+4^2 = 2+ 4x4 = 2+16 = 18

then the outer brackets; 40 - 18 = 22

then the last part; 22 x 2 = 44

But the site gave 8 as the answer. Any idea where I'm going wrong?
The site is wrong.
In the first step, they have [40 - 62] * 2. Here they have done the addition before dealing with the exponent. 2 + 42 = 2 + 16 = 18. Addition is at a lower precedence than exponents. At the site, they are evaluating the expression as if it were (2 + 4)2 rather than 2 + 42 as given in the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cliff Hanley
Mark44 said:
The site is wrong.
In the first step, they have [40 - 62] * 2. Here they have done the addition before dealing with the exponent. 2 + 42 = 2 + 16 = 18. Addition is at a lower precedence than exponents. At the site, they are evaluating the expression as if it were (2 + 4)2 rather than 2 + 42 as given in the problem.
Thank you. So is my answer of 44 (and the route taken to get there) correct?
 
Cliff Hanley said:
I've just come across an example of this on the following website; http://www.bbc.co.uk/education/guides/zqn3r82/revision/5

The example was;

[40 - (2+4^2)] x 2

The site said that if there are two sets of brackets calculate the inside brackets first. I proceeded as follows;

inside brackets; 2+4^2 = 2+ 4x4 = 2+16 = 18

then the outer brackets; 40 - 18 = 22

then the last part; 22 x 2 = 44

But the site gave 8 as the answer. Any idea where I'm going wrong?
The Beeb (or the Boob, in this case) evaluated (2+42) as if it were (2+4)2, which leads to the erroneous answer of 8.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cliff Hanley
SteamKing said:
The Beeb (or the Boob, in this case) evaluated (2+42) as if it were (2+4)2, which leads to the erroneous answer of 8.
What I said in post 2:
At the site, they are evaluating the expression as if it were (2 + 4)2 rather than 2 + 42 as given in the problem.
 
Mark44 said:
Yes.
Thanks.