MHB Bifurcations, steady states, model analysis

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the stability and bifurcation of a piecewise defined model represented by the equations for population dynamics. The steady states identified are \(N_* = \sqrt[b]{r}\) and \(N_* = 0\). The analysis examines three cases: when \(N_t < 0\), \(0 < N_t < \sqrt[b]{r}\), and \(N_t > \sqrt[b]{r}\), to determine the behavior of \(N_{t+1}\) relative to \(N_t\). The stability of the steady states hinges on whether the sequences approach or diverge from these values, with the possibility that both steady states could be unstable. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the dynamics around these critical points to assess stability.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
$N_{t + 1} =\begin{cases}rN_t^{1 - b}, & N_t > K\\
rN_t, & N_t < K
\end{cases}$The steady states are when $N_{t + 1} = N_t = N_*$.
$$
N_{*} =\begin{cases}rN_*^{1 - b}, & N_* > K\\
rN_*, & N_* < K
\end{cases}
$$
So the steady states are $N_* = \sqrt{r}$ and $N_* = 0$.

I am not sure how to check for stability and bifurcations values for a piece wise defined model.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Look at three cases:

1) Suppose $N_t< 0$. What is $N_{t+1}$? Is it larger than $N_t$ so that the sequence is heading toward 0 or is it smaller so the sequence is heading away from 0?

2) Suppose $0< N_t<\sqrt{r}$. What is $N_{t+1}$? Is it less than $N_t$ so the sequence is heading toward 0 or is it larger so it is heading toward $\sqrt{r}$?

3) Suppose $\sqrt{r}< N_t$. What is $N_{t+1}$? Is it less than $N_t$ so the sequence is heading toward $\sqrt{r}$ or is it larger so it is heading away?

If in 1 and 2 you said that the sequence was heading toward 0, then 0 is stable. If in 2 and 3 you said that the sequence was heading toward $\sqrt{r}$ then that is stable. Notice that is is not possible for both 0 and $\sqrt{r}$ both to be stable- if in 2, the sequence is heading toward 0, it cannot be heading toward $\sqrt{r}$. It is, however, possible for them both to be unstable.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K