Big Robot- Lattice boom crane - calculating maximum stress

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the bending stress of a lattice boom crane design, specifically for a telescoping tail supporting a load of 400 pounds with a safety factor of 7x. The user seeks guidance on determining material specifications and lattice dimensions, emphasizing the need for effective length calculations and fitting stability curves. The conversation highlights the complexity of manual calculations and suggests using finite element analysis (FEA) as a more efficient method for evaluating structural integrity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bending stress calculations in structural engineering
  • Familiarity with lattice structures and their load distribution
  • Knowledge of finite element analysis (FEA) techniques
  • Basic principles of safety factors in engineering design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Effective Length concept in lattice structures
  • Learn about Fitting Stability curves and their applications
  • Study finite element analysis using software like ABAQUS
  • Explore literature on hoist and crane design methodologies
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, designers, and hobbyists involved in structural design, particularly those working with cranes and load-bearing structures, will benefit from this discussion.

bigrobotworx
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello brilliant engineers.

How to calculate the bending stress of a lattice boom crane design?

It’s clear how to calculate a single chord in a lattice box, at least as a cantilevered tube. However, when placed in a box lattice what is the proper approach?

I’m constructing this crane in conjunction with a big robot dragon. The “crane” is a telescoping tail that supports both riders and an aerial performer. The tail has two boom sections of 10 feet each, for an extended length of about 18 feet.

I’m attempting to determine the material specifications of the tube cords and lattice dimensions to operate the fully cantilevered working load, say 400 pounds, with a high safety factor (7x failure) to account for dynamic force and fabrication quality.

I believe the first 10 foot section can be calculated at 18 feet. Then the second section can be calculated at 8 feet independently.

Please help me understand the general approach. If there is a general rule between cords in a lattice configuration. And what formula to use, if it can be calculated manually.

I’m not an engineer. But can follow the math in https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cantilever-beam-calculation.992690/

My eternal thanks and invitation to ride a big robot to any that can get me on the proper track!
 

Attachments

  • 42EEE2FB-8F29-4700-A59C-506A8A97F25F.jpeg
    42EEE2FB-8F29-4700-A59C-506A8A97F25F.jpeg
    37.4 KB · Views: 176
Engineering news on Phys.org
Truss structure like this one are calculated in a different manner (with assumptions that only axial loads are carried by members, joints are hinged and external forces act only at the joints). Maybe the literature about hoist and crane devices will be helpful.

However, manual calculation will be quite tedious in this case. It would be beat to use numerical approach (finite element analysis). Here’s a similar example:
https://abaqus-docs.mit.edu/2017/En...gargocrane.htm#simagsa-c-bmsexamplegargocrane
 
I have encountered a vertically oriented hydraulic cylinder that is designed to actuate and slice heavy cabling into sections with a blade. The cylinder is quite small (around 1.5 inches in diameter) and has an equally small stroke. The cylinder is single acting (i.e. it is pressurized from the bottom, and vented to atmosphere with a spring return, roughly 200lbs of force on the spring). The system operates at roughly 2500 psi. Interestingly, the cylinder has a pin that passes through its...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
61K