Big Robot- Lattice boom crane - calculating maximum stress

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the bending stress of a lattice boom crane, one must consider the effective length and material specifications for the tube cords and lattice dimensions, especially under a working load of 400 pounds with a safety factor of 7x. The first section can be treated as an 18-foot cantilever, while the second can be calculated independently at 8 feet. It's essential to apply the correct formulas for lattice configurations, which may differ from standard cantilever calculations due to the nature of axial loads and joint assumptions. While manual calculations are possible, they can be tedious; thus, a numerical approach like finite element analysis is recommended for more accurate results. Understanding the dynamics and literature on hoist and crane devices will further aid in the design process.
bigrobotworx
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello brilliant engineers.

How to calculate the bending stress of a lattice boom crane design?

It’s clear how to calculate a single chord in a lattice box, at least as a cantilevered tube. However, when placed in a box lattice what is the proper approach?

I’m constructing this crane in conjunction with a big robot dragon. The “crane” is a telescoping tail that supports both riders and an aerial performer. The tail has two boom sections of 10 feet each, for an extended length of about 18 feet.

I’m attempting to determine the material specifications of the tube cords and lattice dimensions to operate the fully cantilevered working load, say 400 pounds, with a high safety factor (7x failure) to account for dynamic force and fabrication quality.

I believe the first 10 foot section can be calculated at 18 feet. Then the second section can be calculated at 8 feet independently.

Please help me understand the general approach. If there is a general rule between cords in a lattice configuration. And what formula to use, if it can be calculated manually.

I’m not an engineer. But can follow the math in https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cantilever-beam-calculation.992690/

My eternal thanks and invitation to ride a big robot to any that can get me on the proper track!
 

Attachments

  • 42EEE2FB-8F29-4700-A59C-506A8A97F25F.jpeg
    42EEE2FB-8F29-4700-A59C-506A8A97F25F.jpeg
    37.4 KB · Views: 167
Engineering news on Phys.org
Truss structure like this one are calculated in a different manner (with assumptions that only axial loads are carried by members, joints are hinged and external forces act only at the joints). Maybe the literature about hoist and crane devices will be helpful.

However, manual calculation will be quite tedious in this case. It would be beat to use numerical approach (finite element analysis). Here’s a similar example:
https://abaqus-docs.mit.edu/2017/En...gargocrane.htm#simagsa-c-bmsexamplegargocrane
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top