Big Wind Tunnels - It's Not Everyday

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wind
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of a large wind tunnel for testing models, with participants sharing excitement about the equipment and its capabilities. The conversation includes technical aspects of wind tunnel testing, safety considerations, and historical references to aircraft models.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Participants express excitement about the wind tunnel and its size, with one noting the height of the blades compared to their own height.
  • There are discussions about the maximum wind speed achieved during tests, with a participant mentioning a speed of 205 mph.
  • Some participants inquire about the safety of using the wind tunnel, including humorous warnings against speaking into it.
  • Questions arise regarding the testing of specific aircraft models, such as the Avro Aero, and how they would perform in modern wind tunnels.
  • Concerns are raised about potential issues like engine stalls and inlet distortion at high angles of attack during testing.
  • Participants discuss the historical context of wind tunnel technology and its evolution, referencing subsonic tunnels used since before WWII.
  • There are technical discussions about the design of propellers and turbine blades, including their effects on airflow and turbulence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share enthusiasm for the wind tunnel and its applications, but there are multiple competing views regarding the technical challenges and historical aircraft performance. The discussion remains unresolved on certain technical concerns and the implications of design choices.

Contextual Notes

Some technical claims about airflow, propeller design, and historical wind tunnel usage are made without consensus on their accuracy or implications. The discussion includes speculative elements regarding the performance of different aircraft models in the wind tunnel.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in aerodynamics, wind tunnel testing, aircraft design, and engineering applications may find this discussion relevant.

Cyrus
Messages
3,237
Reaction score
17
Mmmmmmmmmmmm yeah.... not everyday you get to use one of these.

I'll post more pictures once we start running wind tunnel tests. I'm 6'4", each red blade is as tall as I am.

http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/1333/pict0389.jpg

http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/2746/pict0388v.jpg

Relative size (not me)

charles-geisbert-fan.png


F-18 in said tunnel (not our model)
F18-bm.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
That is awesome! How cool is that?!??
 
nice, just don't stick your hand in there
 
That's a pretty bad *** wind tunnel. All the wind tunnels I used to work with were to so lame.

On a side note, has anyone ever seen the wind tunnel they used to develop the A380?
 
Yeah but can you set it to suck?
 
nice!

(a word of caution: as tempting as it may be, I don't think it's safe to speak into it and do the "electric fan robot voice" with this one)
 
Cool machine, Cyrus!

What's the max wind speed?



BTW, did I mention that I've signed you up for ABC's Bachelor TV show? :biggrin: You can use your dating expertise!
 
Very cool Cyrus. Have you guys run an Avro Aero (original 1950s CDN jet fighter shut down by Eisenhower as a threat to US security) in there?! I wonder how it would fair in such a modern wind tunnel. Dig your job man!
 
Fast enough for you? We topped off at about 205mph.

http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/663/pict0397l.jpg

Ffkg1G-g3Gg&feature=channel_page[/y...he CNC machine making and painting the model.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Man, it is good to see a bunch of nerds who get just as excited about stuff like that as I do. :biggrin:
 
  • #11
Cool, Cyrus! Next we want to see you in the tunnel at 205. :biggrin:

Cyrus said:
We spent nearly a month on the CNC machine making and painting the model.

Did you guys design this?
 
  • #12
Ivan Seeking said:
Cool, Cyrus! Next we want to see you in the tunnel at 205. :biggrin:



Did you guys design this?

The model is by a company I work for called American Dynamics. They designed it and I helped them make it in-house.
 
  • #13
Very cool!

Especially how your interest in model planes has led straight to this...really great, and probably pretty unusual. Fantastic!
 
  • #14
That is a very cool model Cyrus. The stealth aspects of it are interesting. Just curious, How do you test it at higher speeds. Are these tests just used to make sure it can take off and land?
 
  • #15
I think the only your job could be more fun is if your wind tunnel were vertical and you could take breaks and "fly" in it!
 
  • #17
moe darklight said:
nice!

(a word of caution: as tempting as it may be, I don't think it's safe to speak into it and do the "electric fan robot voice" with this one)

:smile:
 
  • #18
I didn't think of that! With a megaphone, you could make yourself sound like a 200-ft tall Darth Vader.

Do it do it do it do it do it.
 
  • #19
baywax said:
Very cool Cyrus. Have you guys run an Avro Aero (original 1950s CDN jet fighter shut down by Eisenhower as a threat to US security) in there?! I wonder how it would fair in such a modern wind tunnel. Dig your job man!

Have I got a link for you.

http://www.avroarrow.org/Jim Floyd/JamesFloydRAeS10.html
 
  • #20
I hope you're not showing us any classified information!

Is it loud, or does it run quietly?

When was the last significant advance in air tunnel design?
 
  • #21
That looks like a LOT of fun, Cyrus! Glad you're enjoying what you're doing. :)
 
  • #22
awesome looking model, so sleek! Cool stuff Cyrus
 
  • #23
Looks impressive, but aren't you concerned that there will be a significant loss of trust and engine stalls at high angle of attacks (high g/low speed) conditions? Obviously, the inlet is being shielded off by the nose section then.

Perhaps you have thought of an auxillary inlet underneath, opening in those conditions.
 
Last edited:
  • #24
baywax said:
Very cool Cyrus. Have you guys run an Avro Aero (original 1950s CDN jet fighter shut down by Eisenhower as a threat to US security) in there?! I wonder how it would fair in such a modern wind tunnel. Dig your job man!
It would have fared just fine since the aircraft did pretty well in its flight testing and did not have any really aerodynamic issues (there were plenty of others though). By the way, we have had subsonic tunnels like this since before WWII. That is the only kind of tunnel Avro would have had at their disposal. They did some higher Mach testing with scaled models on missiles.

That is only a theory as to why it was discontinued. There are a lot of theories out there. Don't get Danger and myself started...

Why bring up the CF-105? It's just a bit off topic.
 
  • #25
Andre said:
Looks impressive, but aren't you concerned that there will be a significant loss of trust and engine stalls at high angle of attacks (high g/low speed) conditions? Obviously, the inlet is being shielded off by the nose section then.

Perhaps you have thought of an auxillary inlet underneath, opening in those conditions.
I feel sorry for the powerplant provider. It looks like they'll have some serious inlet distortion to deal with. Perhaps the vehicle won't be experiencing real hard maneuvering.
 
  • #26
Go Terps!
 
  • #27
Awesome. But Raiders of the Lost Ark immediately comes to mind...the Flying Wing scene I mean.

So, yes, you'll definitely not want to get too close to those fan blades. Might end up like this guy...


trivia_08.jpg
 
  • #29
Very nice.

Is that you behind the smoke emitting machine (ok, what do you really call it?)?
 
  • #30
lisab said:
Very nice.

Is that you behind the smoke emitting machine (ok, what do you really call it?)?

It's called a smoke wand.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K