Bill proposed to block public access to publicly funded research

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pythagorean
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Research
AI Thread Summary
The Research Works Act threatens to restrict public access to research funded by American taxpayers, potentially forcing individuals to pay for articles that were initially funded by their tax dollars. If passed, this bill would prevent the National Institutes of Health from requiring grantees to provide free copies of their published research to the National Library of Medicine. Critics argue that the bill serves as a handout to major publishing companies, which already profit significantly from subscription fees. The discussion highlights concerns over the rising costs of journal subscriptions and the lack of transparency regarding publishers' expenses. Overall, the bill raises significant issues about the accessibility of publicly funded research and the influence of lobbyists in shaping policy.
  • #51
Thanks Borek! Ill pass it along!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/01/testify-the-open-science-movement-catches-fire/all/1

For years, the open science movement has sought to light a fire about the “closed” journal-publication system. In the last few weeks their efforts seemed to have ignited a broader flame, driven mainly, it seems, by the revelation that one of the most resented publishers, Elsevier, was backing the Research Works Act

scientists are pledging by the hundreds to not cooperate with Elsevier in any way — refusing to publish in its journals, referee its papers, or do the editorial work that researchers have been supplying to journals without charge for decades

Read also two series of comments below the text.
 
  • #53
Vanadium 50 said:
No, what happens is that people explain why their new ideas are good, not why their old ideas are wrong.

I would put that into more cynical words, but those words would get me banned.
 
Back
Top