Binomial Distribution satisfies Marcoff Chain

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Binomial Distribution and its relation to Markov Chains. The original poster presents a mathematical expression for the Binomial Distribution and seeks to demonstrate that it satisfies a specific Markov chain condition involving parameters N and m.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the manipulation of factorial expressions and the transformation of denominators to match the required form for the Markov chain condition. There is an attempt to simplify the expressions and a discussion on whether certain multiplications are necessary.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on factoring and transforming expressions, while others express difficulty in simplifying the factorials. There is an ongoing exploration of how to align the denominators of the expressions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the problem statement and the definitions of the Binomial Distribution and Markov chains. There is an emphasis on ensuring that the mathematical manipulations adhere to the properties of factorials.

ppedro
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement

Consider the Binomial Distribution in the form

[itex]P_{N}(m)=\frac{N!}{(\frac{N+m}{2})!(\frac{N-m}{2})!}p^{\frac{N+m}{2}}q^{\frac{N-m}{2}}[/itex]

where [itex]p+q=1[/itex], [itex]m[/itex] is the independent variable and [itex]N[/itex] is a parameter.

Show that it satisfies the marcoff chain

[itex]P_{N+1}\left(m\right)=pP_{N}\left(m-1\right)+qP_{N}\left(m+1\right)[/itex]

2. The attempt at a solution

I'm trying my solution starting from this:

[itex]pP_{N}\left(m-1\right)+qP_{N}\left(m+1\right)[/itex]


[itex]=p\frac{N!}{\left(\frac{N+m-1}{2}\right)!\left(\frac{N-m+1}{2}\right)!}p^{\frac{N+m-1}{2}}q^{\frac{N-m+1}{2}}+q\frac{N!}{\left(\frac{N+m+1}{2}\right)!\left(\frac{N-m-1}{2}\right)!}p^{\frac{N+m+1}{2}}q^{\frac{N-m-1}{2}}[/itex]


[itex]=\frac{N!}{\left(\frac{N+m-1}{2}\right)!\left(\frac{N-m+1}{2}\right)!}p^{\frac{N+m+1}{2}}q^{\frac{N-m+1}{2}}+\frac{N!}{\left(\frac{N+m+1}{2}\right)!\left(\frac{N-m-1}{2}\right)!}p^{\frac{N+m+1}{2}}q^{\frac{N-m+1}{2}}[/itex]


[itex]=p^{\frac{N+m+1}{2}}q^{\frac{N-m+1}{2}}\left(\frac{N!}{\left(\frac{N+m-1}{2}\right)!\left(\frac{N-m+1}{2}\right)!}+\frac{N!}{\left(\frac{N+m+1}{2}\right)!\left(\frac{N-m-1}{2}\right)!}\right)[/itex]


I can't go any further. If you can help I would appreciate.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(Edit) See what happens if you multiply by##\frac{N+1}{N+1}##.
 
My previous comment was based on a particular way that I went about it which got to the result. But, on review, I see that multiplying by (N+1)/(N+1) isn't necessary.

I would factor out the ##N!## in your expression.

The important thing is to get the two denominators in your expression to match the denominator in ##P_{N+1}(m)##. For example, what could you multiply the numerator and denominator of ##\frac{1}{\left(\frac{N+m-1}{2}\right)!\left(\frac{N-m+1}{2}\right)!}## by to get the denominator in ##P_{N+1}(m)##?

[By the way, welcome to PF, ppedro!]
 
Hey TSny! Thanks for your reply. I see what you're suggesting but I'm not being able to compute it. The factorials are not helping me simplify the expression.
 
##P_{N+1}(m)## has a denominator of ##(\frac{N+m+1}{2})!(\frac{N-m+1}{2})!##.

Compare that to your first denominator ##(\frac{N+m-1}{2})!(\frac{N-m+1}{2})!##.

To get your denominator to match the denominator in ##P_{N+1}(m)##, you've got to somehow transform ##(\frac{N+m-1}{2})!## into ##(\frac{N+m+1}{2})!##.

What can you multiply ##(\frac{N+m-1}{2})!## by to produce ##(\frac{N+m+1}{2})!##?
 
[itex]\frac{(N+m+1)!}{(N+m-1)!}=\frac{(N+m+1)(N+m)(N+m-1)!}{(N+m-1)!}=(N+m+1)(N+m)[/itex]
 
No. Note that ##\frac{N+m+1}{2} = \frac{N+m-1}{2} + 1##.
 
Ok, I see your point. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K