Binomial Expansion: Solve Example & Get Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter RMHAZARD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion
AI Thread Summary
To find the coefficient of x cubed in the expansion of (2 + 3x) to the power of 5, one can utilize the binomial theorem and Pascal's triangle. The expansion can be calculated by applying the coefficients from the fifth row of Pascal's triangle, which are 1, 5, 10, 10, 5, 1. By substituting these coefficients into the binomial expansion formula, the coefficient of x cubed is determined to be 1080. This method is more efficient than multiplying out the binomial directly. Understanding binomial coefficients and their application simplifies the process of binomial expansion significantly.
RMHAZARD
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
hi i have a whole page of bionomial expansion homework from as teacher and have never encountered it before here is an example of one of my questions could someone please show me how its done.

example:
find the coefficient of x (cubed) in the expansion of (2 + 3x) (to the power of 5)

i am completely stuck,

thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
x (cubed) in the expansion of (2 + 3x) (to the power of 5)

well that's kinda easy actually, just think of
(2 + 3x)^{5} as (2 +3x)(2 +3x)(2 +3x)(2 +3x)(2 +3x)
so just multiply out using foil...looks like its going to take a while but I am assuming its just for practice and to get u into the mood of foil for other questions about functions
 
To solve (a+b)^{n}, Pascal's triangle may help you:
1 n=0
1 1 n=1
1 2 1 n=2
1 3 3 1 n=3
1 4 6 4 1 n=4
1 5 10 10 5 1 n=5
1 6 15 20 15 6 1 n=6
1 7 21 35 35 21 7 1 n=7
1 8 28 56 70 56 28 8 1 n=8

I've shown the first 9 lines, however, you can continue writing lines indefinitely. Every number is the sum of upper two. For example in n=3 line, 1 = 0 + 1, 2 = 1 + 1, 1 = 1 + 0. In n=4 line 1 = 0 + 1, 3 = 1 + 2, 3 = 2 + 1, 1 = 1 + 0 and so on.

Numbers in these lines coefficients for expansion of (a+b)^{n}.

(a+b)^{n} can be expanded to Ca^{n}+Ca^{n-1}b+Ca^{n-2}b^{2}+...+Ca^{2}b^{n-2}+Cab^{n-1}+Cb^{n} where C are the coefficients from line n.

For example:
(a+b)^{3}=a^{3}+3a^{2}b+3ab^{2}+b^{3}

To expand (2+3x)^{5} we must take the coefficients from n=5 line =>
(2+3x)^{5}=2^{5}+5*2^{4}*3x+10*2^{3}*(3x)^{2}+10*2^{2}*(3x)^{3}+5*2*(3x)^{4}+(3x)^{5} = 32+270x+720x^{2}+1080x^{3}+810x^{4}+243x^{5}

If I calculated correctly, than from this you can see that the coefficient of x cubed is 1080. I think that expanding the binomial this way is much easier than multiplying.

I hope that helps.

P.S. If you see the triangle with a straight angle, than look http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal_triangle" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You can get at this quicker through binominal coefficients: (3X+2)^5, the coefficient on x^3 will be 5!/(3!2!) = 10, but you have to consider the three on x and the 2 as well.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
2
Replies
91
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Back
Top