A Bipolar transport in a simple illuminated semiconductor bar

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the application of bipolar transport theory in voltage-applied semiconductor materials, particularly p-type c-Si bars. It highlights the relationship between light-generated electron-hole pairs and the expected net current, noting that delta n and delta p should move together but do not produce a net light current. The conversation emphasizes that external bias is necessary for current generation and that the majority carriers primarily contribute to conductivity. Ultimately, the confusion was resolved by recognizing that bipolar transport describes carrier movement differently than electrical current, which depends on the dynamics of both n and p carriers. The insights shared clarify the distinction between bipolar transport and light conductivity in semiconductors.
zhanghe
Messages
43
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
light-conducivity and the practical movement of electron and hole.
I feel quite confused for a few days, when I apply the bipolar transport equation into a voltage-applied semicondutor material (e.g. p-type c-Si bar, or a resistor) which just have some light-generated electron-hole pairs by a pulse of photon at somewhere on the bar. In terms of bipolar transport theory, the delta n and delta p should go together along the bar in the direction as the so-called minority carrier should go (as the e.g. above, the electron for a p-type c-Si) . However, it seems that there will be no net light current, because delta n and delta p always accompany each other on the 1-D bar. On the other hand, we always use the delta n + delta p the sum to give a light electrical current (i.e. light conductivity).
Please give me some hints, there must be somewhere wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is why one needs a PN junction to produce photocurrent!
 
There should also be a photocurrent on a p-type (or n-type) material without PN junction, the so-called the light-conductivity for material. :confused:
 
zhanghe said:
TL;DR Summary: light-conducivity and the practical movement of electron and hole.

In terms of bipolar transport theory, the delta n and delta p should go together along the bar in the direction as the so-called minority carrier should go (as the e.g. above, the electron for a p-type c-Si)
But the material must be externally biased in order to produce current. Why do you think they are equal??
 
When there is a current in a material externally biased, could you help me to analyze the composition of the current, the density of two carriers and their movement direct? I thought about it for a while last night and attach a file below, that could explain my confusion easily.
1679959298409.jpeg
 
I believe the the conductivity comes mostly from the majority carriers whose number in the conduction band is promoted by the light, hence the photoresponse. I do not understand your sketch but I believe the "bipolar transport" is secondary.
I am not expert in this field so invite comment!!
 
zhanghe said:
TL;DR Summary: light-conducivity and the practical movement of electron and hole.

I feel quite confused for a few days, when I apply the bipolar transport equation into a voltage-applied semicondutor material (e.g. p-type c-Si bar, or a resistor) which just have some light-generated electron-hole pairs by a pulse of photon at somewhere on the bar. In terms of bipolar transport theory, the delta n and delta p should go together along the bar in the direction as the so-called minority carrier should go (as the e.g. above, the electron for a p-type c-Si) . However, it seems that there will be no net light current, because delta n and delta p always accompany each other on the 1-D bar. On the other hand, we always use the delta n + delta p the sum to give a light electrical current (i.e. light conductivity).
Please give me some hints, there must be somewhere wrong.
Maybe, you will find some information on photoconductivity at
https://www.eeeguide.com/photoconductivity-definition-working-and-its-applications/
 
Thanks guys. I could withdraw this "problem" for now. Finally, I found my mistake, the bipolar transport, ie. the movement of the delta n is totally different the electrical current. the bipolar is more like a kind of forms, but when you look into the current, you have to go to the movement of the n and p. Anyway, thanks your guys so much.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K