Birth of Strings: String Theory Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter clerk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strings
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

String theory posits that all particles in the universe are manifestations of vibrations of fundamental strings. While the theory describes these strings mathematically, it does not provide a definitive answer regarding their composition or existence beyond theoretical constructs. The discussion emphasizes that string theory serves as a potential fundamental theory underlying general relativity, but it remains a hypothesis rather than a fully established theory. The inability to ascertain the nature of strings or spacetime from this framework highlights the ongoing challenges in theoretical physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of string theory concepts
  • Familiarity with general relativity
  • Basic knowledge of theoretical physics
  • Mathematical formalism in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical formalism used in string theory
  • Explore the relationship between string theory and general relativity
  • Investigate current experimental predictions related to string theory
  • Study the implications of string theory on the nature of spacetime
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, students of advanced physics, and anyone interested in the foundational aspects of string theory and its implications for our understanding of the universe.

clerk
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am sorry if this sounds too philosophical but thanks for any inputs ..

String theory claims that every particle in this universe is actually a manifestation of vibrations of fundamental strings. But how do these strings came into existence in the first place ? I understand the concept of stringy vibrations producing particles but what are these strings made up of ? Are they purely theoretical constructs ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
clerk said:
... but what are these strings made up of ? Are they purely theoretical constructs ?
Yes.

We use a mathematical formalism to describe nature, that means we must be able to extract physical content, experiments, predictions for measurable quantities (which does not work well with strings ;-) But we cannot say what these mathematical entities "are made of".

Look at ordinary general relativity: the fundamental entity is a four-dim. manifold which we call spacetime. The mathematical formalism tells us that the manifold can be curved in quite complex ways. We can associate this curvature to measurable effects (gravitation, gravitational waves, the expanding universe, ...). But we cannot answer the question "what this manifold is made of".

What we can do is to try to find more fundamental descriptions like string theory as a fundamental theory underlying general relativity (and other theories). If this approach is successful we can explain to some extent how the macroscopic spacetime manifold emerges from the microscopic strings, so in some sense we can answer the question for spacetime (but to be honest, I don't see that string theory already provides an answer to this question; I would not call it a theory but a hypothesis, or a "theory under construction"; so we cannot claim to be able to answer the question for spacetime using strings; and of course we cannot answer the question for strings themselves, either)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
In string theory strings are fundamental, just electron or photon in SM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K