Black body radiation and the derivation of Stefan Boltzman

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the Stefan-Boltzmann law, specifically addressing the conversion of the variable of integration from dλ to dx. Participants clarify that dλ is not equivalent to dx, and the correct relationship is established through the equation λ = a/x, leading to the differential dλ = -(a/x²)dx. This precise conversion is crucial for accurate calculations in black body radiation analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically differentiation
  • Familiarity with the concepts of black body radiation
  • Knowledge of the Stefan-Boltzmann law
  • Basic grasp of variable substitution in integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Stefan-Boltzmann law in detail
  • Learn about variable substitution techniques in calculus
  • Explore the implications of black body radiation in thermodynamics
  • Investigate applications of the Stefan-Boltzmann law in astrophysics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students studying thermodynamics and radiation, particularly those focusing on black body radiation and its mathematical derivations.

dcarmichael
Messages
17
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
The total intensity i(t) radiated from a blackbody is given by the integral from 0 to infinity of all wavelengths of the Planck distribution.But I keep seem to be getting the wrong answer. Could someone point out where I'm going wrong
Relevant Equations
Let l=lambda I(l,T)=(2Pihc^2)/l^5 *1/(e^(hc/lkT)-1)
20191102_144741.jpg
20191102_144734.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you replace dλ with when converting to x as the variable of integration?
 
haruspex said:
What did you replace dλ with when converting to x as the variable of integration?
I didnt indicate it but dλ is replaced with dx since x is new variable of integration
 
dcarmichael said:
I didnt indicate it but dλ is replaced with dx since x is new variable of integration
##d\lambda \neq dx##

Note that you can write ##\lambda = \large \frac{a}{x}##, where ##a## is a constant. Taking the differential of both sides of this relation, you should get ##d\lambda = \boxed ?\, dx##. What goes inside the box?
 
TSny said:
##d\lambda \neq dx##

Note that you can write ##\lambda = \large \frac{a}{x}##, where ##a## is a constant. Taking the differential of both sides of this relation, you should get ##d\lambda = \boxed ?\, dx##. What goes inside the box?
dλ= -(a/x^2)dx
 
Ok. Go for it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
969
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K