B Black hole emits quantum particles from the mass sucked in?

diPoleMoment
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
So the Hawking radiation and the flinging of matter from the black hole, could this explain where all the matter goes? I am unsure of the theory for the second one, but if matter is broken to its quantum particles then why can't those quantum particles be in the Hawking radiation. Still very basic knowledge of his theory. However would those explain dark energy and dark matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
diPoleMoment said:
could this explain where all the matter goes?

What do you mean by "where all the matter goes"? What sort of scenario are you thinking of?

diPoleMoment said:
if matter is broken to its quantum particles then why can't those quantum particles be in the Hawking radiation

Hawking radiation is quantum particles.

diPoleMoment said:
would those explain dark energy and dark matter?

If you mean, could dark energy and dark matter be composed of particles emitted from black holes by Hawking radiation, no. Hawking radiation is much, much too faint.
 
So I know that there is the mass attracted by the gravitational force. I know that there is the mass that goes into the black hole and gets torn apart by the forces within the black hole. I guess I do not know about different planes of reality. I saw on the internet about the while black hole where everything that, I assume, goes into the black hole goes out of the white hole. I guess if the dark matter spreading in the universe as well as dark energy, I was assuming it was from the matter of the black holes. If that is so, then how does it escape the black hole?
 
diPoleMoment said:
I know that there is the mass that goes into the black hole and gets torn apart by the forces within the black hole.

By tidal gravity, yes.

diPoleMoment said:
I guess I do not know about different planes of reality.

I don't know what you mean by "different planes of reality".

diPoleMoment said:
I saw on the internet

Where? Please give a specific reference. And you might want to look at PF's rules about acceptable sources. Pop science websites and videos are not acceptable sources. You need to be looking at textbooks or peer-reviewed papers.

diPoleMoment said:
everything that, I assume, goes into the black hole goes out of the white hole

No, that's not what a white hole is. It seems like your question is based on a misconception.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top