Black hole why wouldn't this work

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vdub
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impossibility of escaping a black hole once an object crosses the event horizon. It is established that any force exerted to escape would require infinite acceleration, making it unfeasible for any object with mass. The conversation also highlights that photons cannot escape the event horizon, reinforcing the conclusion that no spacecraft can either. The participants reference Kruskal coordinates to illustrate the behavior of light and objects near a black hole, emphasizing that once inside the event horizon, all paths lead to the singularity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black hole physics and event horizons
  • Familiarity with Kruskal coordinates and their implications
  • Basic knowledge of general relativity and gravitational effects on light
  • Concept of infinite acceleration and its physical implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of black holes and their event horizons in detail
  • Learn about Kruskal coordinates and their application in general relativity
  • Explore the concept of singularities and their implications in physics
  • Investigate the role of light in gravitational fields and its behavior near black holes
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, physicists, and students of general relativity who seek to deepen their understanding of black hole mechanics and the nature of spacetime around extreme gravitational fields.

vdub
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I read that there is no way to escape a black hole once you enter the no-escape-boundary, no matter what you do.
Your ship travels directly towards the center point of the black hole so that it doesn't orbit it. After it passes the no-escape-boundary, you thrust in the opposite direction with a slightly greater force than the gravity pulling it in. So you slowly move from the black hole's center and escape the black hole. Why wouldn't this work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because it would require an infinite amount of acceleration. Photons can not even escape the black hole - as they approach the event horizon they slow down and simply hover near it, never actually passing it. If a photon can't escape, nothing with mass has any chance to.
 
I could see if the ship were orbiting the black hole. But what if it were traveling towards it like a 1-dimensional line. The force pulling you in is finite, if you push back with a slightly greater force you should still get sucked in?
 
vdub said:
The force pulling you in is finite
That's basically where you go wrong. Force required to keep an object stationary at event horizon is infinite.
 
This bugs me also. I keep envisioning an Earth with a hole running through it. After falling in, I continue to fall until I reach ground-level on the opposite side. At this point, all of my kinetic energy has been converted to potential energy again before falling back into the Earth. If at any time during my fall, I were to hit my jet pack accelerator, I would be able to get much higher than just ground-level.

Now, crank up the density of the planet until ground-level becomes an event horizon. My potential energy while standing on the surface has increased dramatically, but so will the amount of kinetic energy gained from my fall.

I can only suspect that falling beyond the event horizon would want to accelerate the object beyond the speed of light, which is impossible. Instead, energy is transferred to the object by a different means than kinetic energy, such as mass. Now that the object has increased mass at the expense of original potential energy, it no longer has enough kinetic energy to reach the event horizon, and will remain trapped.

So, yeah.. it bugs me that I should know better.
 
There are nice coordinates where this problem can be shown.

zd9xnz73.jpg


If you happen to be at the event horizon, it appears to you that this is moving away from you with the speed of light (lines in a 45°-angle are "moving" with the speed of light) and that the singularity moves towards you even faster than the speed of light. Note that the event horizon and the singularity does not actually move around - it is more like "the space moves towards it". And you are limited to the speed of light relative to this moving space. Once you are inside, there is no way out. Every direction of movement is towards the singularity.
 
dipole said:
Photons can not even escape the black hole - as they approach the event horizon they slow down and simply hover near it, never actually passing it. .

HUH ? Where did you get this idea? Can you site any references?
 
phinds said:
HUH ? Where did you get this idea? Can you site any references?

Phinds is right to question this. As shown in mfb's picture (based in Kruskal coordinates), any light emitted inside the event horizon soon meets the singularity.
 
PAllen said:
Phinds is right to question this. As shown in mfb's picture (based in Kruskal coordinates), any light emitted inside the event horizon soon meets the singularity.

Well no, not necessarily. In general a light signal will intercept the singularity but one which starts exactly at the event horizon will neither propagate inward or out, it will remain stationary forever.

So I guess what I said was misleading, which is my fault, but the point I was making that even in the best possible scenario photons can't escape, so no spaceship could either.
 
  • #10
dipole said:
Well no, not necessarily. In general a light signal will intercept the singularity but one which starts exactly at the event horizon will neither propagate inward or out, it will remain stationary forever.

So I guess what I said was misleading, which is my fault, but the point I was making that even in the best possible scenario photons can't escape, so no spaceship could either.

Please read what you quoted: "any light emitted inside the event horizon soon meets the singularity".

Is light emitted at the event horizon the same a light emitted inside the event horizon? There is no exception to my statement in the black hole region of SC geometry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
8K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
925
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K