I Black Holes Colliding Exactly Head On

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter peanutaxis
  • Start date Start date
peanutaxis
Messages
25
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Where would the energy go?
Hi,

So when black holes circle each other and eventually collide to form one larger black hole [I believe] that the gravitational potential energy is turned into ripples in spacetime. But that makes me wonder, what if two black holes collided exactly head on? Surely there is a massive amount of gravitational potential energy that.....where would it go?

Thanks,
p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It isn't as simple as "gravitational potential energy", since you can't really define that in the kind of spacetime you get with two black holes. However, energy is carried away as gravitational radiation, yes. If it doesn't get carried away somehow it simply contributes to the mass or spin of the final black hole. So two holes colliding head on make a different (probably larger) black hole than an identical pair that spiral in.
 
Moderator's note: Thread moved to the relativity forum.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...

Similar threads

Back
Top