Black Holes & Time: How Do We Observe Movement?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jacob Gable
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies misconceptions about black holes and the perception of time. Contrary to popular belief, time does not slow down for objects falling into a black hole; rather, it appears to slow down to distant observers. Observations of stars being consumed by black holes are possible because the matter appears to slow as it approaches the Event Horizon, but it is indeed falling in. The conversation also touches on the Holographic Principle, proposed by Leonard Susskind, which suggests that information about matter falling into a black hole is retained on the Event Horizon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black hole physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of the Event Horizon
  • Knowledge of the Holographic Principle
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Leonard Susskind's "The Black Hole War: My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the World Safe for Quantum Mechanics"
  • Learn about the Holographic Principle and its implications in theoretical physics
  • Study the effects of gravity on time as described by General Relativity
  • Explore observational techniques for studying black holes and their effects on surrounding matter
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of black holes and time perception.

Jacob Gable
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm not a physicist so I am very igorant on this subject. From I know time gets slower and slower as you approach a black hole and an outside observer would never actually see matter being gobbled up. But I have read about stars get observed getting eaten away. How is this possible? And how do black holes move? If time essentially stops in one how do we observe it move in space?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are experiencing a very common misconception brought about by poor (and even fallacious) descriptions in pop-sci presentations.

Jacob Gable said:
I'm not a physicist so I am very igorant on this subject. From I know time gets slower and slower as you approach a black hole
No, it does not. It just looks that way to a distant observer.
and an outside observer would never actually see matter being gobbled up.
Correct.

But I have read about stars get observed getting eaten away. How is this possible?
The matter being eaten appears to slow down as it approaches the Event Horizon but we see it headed that way and infer correctly that despite how it looks to us, it is in fact falling into the Event Horizon.

And how do black holes move?
just like everything else in the universe moves.
If time essentially stops in one how do we observe it move in space?
Since time does NOT slow down, there's no issue.
 
Might I ask whether its true that matter or energy falling into a black hole always leaves information on the event horizon?

(Talk about Big Brother surveillance...)
 
RelativeRelativity said:
Might I ask whether its true that matter or energy falling into a black hole always leaves information on the event horizon?

(Talk about Big Brother surveillance...)
That's what Leonard Susskind believes and finally convinced Stephen Hawking of (Google "The Holographic Principle"). Personally, I just don't get the holographic principle at all but I do concede that those guys know more than I do.

Susskind wrote a book about it "The Black Hole War: My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the World Safe for Quantum Mechanics"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RelativeRelativity
Thank you, I'm a little familiar. If I believe an electron can be everywhere at once I'm at the mercy of experts from there on lol
 
RelativeRelativity said:
Thank you, I'm a little familiar. If I believe an electron can be everywhere at once I'm at the mercy of experts from there on lol
Yes, but an electron can NOT be everywhere at once. That's another pop-sci fallacy. It can be ANYWHERE until measured, but that's a far cry from being everywhere at once.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RelativeRelativity
Thanks I hadn't planned to mention it, you get a lot thrown in when googling for research.
 
If electrons really are everywhere at once I urgently need better reading glasses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RelativeRelativity

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K