TheStatutoryApe
- 296
- 4
russ_watters said:You're twisting the meaning of "disenfranchised". These people wouldn't be able to register at all, correct? So they are unregestered votors who think they can vote, not registered votors who are being prevented from voting. What happened to them doesn't actually change anything.
If Turbo is correct in his answer to my question then these people could still have registered to vote in person before the primary even though they could no longer register via mail. So, as he stated, if they turned up on the day of the primary assuming they had been registered they would be turned away AND would have missed the opportunity they had in the mean time to still register in person.
As a matter of fact it says so right here...
http://www.sboe.state.nc.us/content.aspx?id=32
One-Stop Absentee Voting apparently extends to three days before the official primary.
This definitely looks like some dirty pool.
I actually posted a couple years ago about getting calls from non-prof and campaign automated call systems that blocked their caller ID. I thought it should have been illegal at the time and now it looks like there is good reason why it should be. Why do they need to block the caller ID anyway? To make sure we'll answer?Turbo said:Because WVWV covered its identity in the calls and mailings, some people thought that they were running an identity-theft operation, and contacted the VA state police.
Last edited by a moderator: