Block Collision: Find Distance for Elastic & Inelastic Collisions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the distance traveled by two blocks after a collision, specifically for elastic and inelastic scenarios. Block 1, with mass m1, slides down a frictionless ramp from a height of 3.1 m and collides with stationary Block 2, which has a mass of 5m1. The calculated distances are 0.984 m for the elastic collision and 0.246 m for the completely inelastic collision. The key equations used include the conservation of momentum and kinematic equations for motion under friction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum in collisions
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations, specifically vf^2 = vi^2 + 2as
  • Familiarity with concepts of kinetic friction and its coefficient
  • Basic principles of energy conversion from potential to kinetic energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the conservation of momentum in elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Learn how to calculate potential energy and its conversion to kinetic energy using mgh
  • Explore the effects of friction on motion and how to calculate stopping distances
  • Investigate the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions in detail
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, collision theory, and energy conservation principles.

DavidAp
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Block 1 of mass m1 slides from rest along a frictionless ramp from height h = 3.1 m and then collides with stationary block 2, which has mass m2 = 5m1. After the collision, block 2 slides into a region where the coefficient of kinetic friction µk is 0.35 and comes to a stop in distance d within that region. What is the value of distance d if the collision is (a) elastic and (b) completely inelastic?

Answers
(a) 0.984 m
(b) 0.246 m


Relevant Equations
m1u1 + m2u2 = m1v1 + m2v2
vf^2 = vi^2 + 2as (where s is the Δx)
_______________________________________________

This is what I attempted.
I started the problem by working on part (b) first because it seemed that finding the distance traveled through and inelastic collision would be easier due to the shared final velocity. I know that,
h = 3.1m
m2 = 5m1
μk = 0.35.

so I use the formula m1u1 + m2u2 = (m1 + m2)v. However, since block two has no initial velocity the equation becomes m1u1 = (m1 + m2)v. Replacing m1u1 with mgh I get,
v(m1 + m2) = mgh
v = m1gh/(m1 + m2)
v = m1(9.8)(3.1)/(5m1+m1)
v = 30.38m1/6m1
v = 5.06

From there I use the kinematic equation
vf^2 = vi^2 + 2as
knowing vf = 0 and, by searching the web I found that F = ma = -μkmg making, a = -μkg I plug in my knowns into the equation.
s = -vi^2/-μkg
s = -(5.06^2)/-0.35(9.8)
s = 7.46

Now thank goodness I took geometry because 7.46 = 0.246 does not pass the reflexive property! A joke of course but this brings me to my question: what did I do wrong? Obviously something horrible which will dishearten physics lovers everywhere but please, show pity. I'm having difficulty understanding this.

Can somebody explain to me what I did wrong and what I should have done to get the right answer instead and why (especially why! Baby words please!). I will very much appreciate your help. Thank you for taking the time to review my question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


DavidAp said:
This is what I attempted.
I started the problem by working on part (b) first because it seemed that finding the distance traveled through and inelastic collision would be easier due to the shared final velocity. I know that,
h = 3.1m
m2 = 5m1
μk = 0.35.

so I use the formula m1u1 + m2u2 = (m1 + m2)v. However, since block two has no initial velocity the equation becomes m1u1 = (m1 + m2)v. Replacing m1u1 with mgh I get,
There's your problem. m1u1 is a momentum; mgh is an energy. You cannot set one equal to another.

Use mgh to find m1's speed at the bottom, then you can calculate m1u1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K