Block hanging from cord submerged in water, find density

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block hanging from a cord, submerged in a liquid within a beaker, with measurements provided for the mass of the beaker, liquid, and the readings from a spring balance and kitchen scales. The objective is to determine the density of the liquid and the readings of the scales when the block is pulled out of the liquid.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the readings on the kitchen scales and spring balance, questioning how the scales can show a large reading. They discuss the forces acting on the system, including tension, weight, and buoyancy, and analyze the implications of these forces on the readings.

Discussion Status

Participants have engaged in a detailed analysis of the forces involved, with some suggesting a force balance approach. There is recognition of the need to clarify the relationship between the mass of the block and the displaced liquid, and some participants are working towards a clearer understanding of buoyancy and its role in the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions regarding the forces acting on the system, particularly in relation to the tension in the cord and the buoyant force. Some participants express confusion regarding the readings of the scales and the implications for the mass of the block and displaced liquid.

Taniaz
Messages
364
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A block hangs by a cord from a spring balance and is submerged in a liquid contained in a beaker. The beaker in turn rests on a kitchen scales. The mass of the beaker is 1 kg, the mass of the liquid is 1.5 kg. The spring balance read 2.5 kg and the kitchen scales reads 7.5 kg. The volume of the block is 0.0030 m^3.
(a)What is the mass per unit volume of the liquid?
(b) What will the spring balance and the kitchen scales read if the block is pulled up out of the liquid?

Homework Equations


Fb = weight of displaced liquid = ρgV = mg
mass of displaced liquid=mass of block
Volume of displaced liquid = volume of block

The Attempt at a Solution


For part a I'm a little confused with respect to the masses shown by the scales, how is the kitchen scales showing such a big reading? Where is it coming from? Part a wants the density, I already know the volume of the block = volume of displaced liquid, just need to figure out the mass.
Not sure of part b.

I have another hunch. If we subtract the mass of the beaker and that of the liquid from the kitchen scales mass we get 7.5-(1.5+1) = 5kg and I presume this is the mass of the block and the displaced liquid? Then we subtract the mass of the block which is 2.5 kg as shown by the spring balance I presume from 5 kg to get 5-2.5 = 2.5 kg as the mass of the displaced liquid?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Taniaz said:
For part a I'm a little confused with respect to the masses shown by the scales, how is the kitchen scales showing such a big reading? Where is it coming from?
What determines the kitchen scale reading?

Try doing an analysis of all forces acting on the "system" (beaker + liquid + block). What must those forces add to?
 
The kitchen scales reading is the mass of all 3 combined and the displaced liquid?
The downward force must be the weight of all 3 combined and the upward force is the upthrust or the buoyancy?
 
Taniaz said:
The kitchen scales reading is the mass of all 3 combined and the displaced liquid?
What about that cord, which is pulling up?

Taniaz said:
The downward force must be the weight of all 3 combined and the upward force is the upthrust or the buoyancy?
Do this: Draw an imaginary box around the "system". Identify all forces acting on the system. (One of them will be the force exerted by the kitchen scale.)
 
Oh yes you're right, so the kitchen scale reading is the sum of 5 things?

So one will be the force exerted by the kitchen scale on the box, the weight and the tension in the string?
 
Taniaz said:
So one will be the force exerted by the kitchen scale on the box, the weight and the tension in the string?
Yes. And what must the net force on the system be? Set up an equation that adds up all those forces. (There will only be one unknown--the one you want to solve for.)
 
The net force should be 0?
So T+N = w where t is the tension, N is the force by the kitchen scales on the system and w is the combined weight
T will be 25 N? N will be 75N? and weight is the weight of the block, liquid and beaker? With the only unknown being the weight of the block?
 
Taniaz said:
The net force should be 0?
So T+N = w where t is the tension, N is the force by the kitchen scales on the system and w is the combined weight
T will be 25 N? N will be 75N? and weight is the weight of the block, liquid and beaker? With the only unknown being the weight of the block?
Good! (Since they are expressing the forces in terms of kilograms, that means that you'd multiply them all by g to get Newtons. But since they are all multiplied by g, the gs cancel.)
 
So we simply say
2.5 kg+ 7.5kg= (m of block + 1 kg + 1.5 kg)
so m=7.5 kg
since mass of block =mass of displaced liquid
and volume of block=volume of displaced liquid for density=m/V= 7.5/0.003 =2500 kg/m^3.
but how can the mass of the block equal the mass on
the kitchen scale? That doesn't make sense for part b.

Edit: for part b, I think the spring balance will read the same but I'm not sure what the kitchen scale will read
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Taniaz said:
So we simply say
2.5 kg+ 7.5kg= (m of block + 1 kg + 1.5 kg)
so m=7.5 kg
since mass of block =mass of displaced liquid
and volume of block=volume of displaced liquid for density=m/V= 7.5/0.003 =2500 kg/m^3.
Looks good to me.

Taniaz said:
but how can the mass of the block equal the mass on
the kitchen scale? That doesn't make sense for part b.
Why not? Just happens that the upward force of the tension cancels the weight of the beaker + liquid. So what?

Taniaz said:
Edit: for part b, I think the spring balance will read the same but I'm not sure what the kitchen scale will read
Why do you think the spring balance will read the same?

Do the same kind of force analysis for part b. Note that the block is totally removed from the liquid now, so there's no longer an interaction between them.
 
  • #11
No actually once it's removed, for the cord and the block there will be just 2 forces: Tension and weight of the block and for the beaker, liquid and kitchen scales, there will be the weight of the beaker and the liquid and the force by the kitchen scales so N= w which implies that 1.5+1=2.5 kg for the kitchen scales and T=w so 7.5 kg for the spring balance?
 
  • #12
Taniaz said:
No actually once it's removed, for the cord and the block there will be just 2 forces: Tension and weight of the block and for the beaker, liquid and kitchen scales, there will be the weight of the beaker and the liquid and the force by the kitchen scales so N= w which implies that 1.5+1=2.5 kg for the kitchen scales and T=w so 7.5 kg for the spring balance?
Yes, you've got it.
 
  • #13
Thank you! :)
 
  • #14
Taniaz said:
So we simply say
2.5 kg+ 7.5kg= (m of block + 1 kg + 1.5 kg)
so m=7.5 kg
OK

since mass of block =mass of displaced liquid
Why would this be true?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #15
TSny said:
Why would this be true?
Good catch. Luckily that statement wasn't used in the calculation.

Taniaz said:
since mass of block =mass of displaced liquid
and volume of block=volume of displaced liquid for density=m/V= 7.5/0.003 =2500 kg/m^3.
The calculation is fine, but that verbiage surrounding it needs correction. (I should have done that earlier.)

The mass of the block you had just calculated. That has nothing to do with the mass of displaced liquid.

And the volume of the block was given. So you correctly calculated the density using m/V. No need for displaced liquid at this point.
 
  • #16
But part (a) asks for the density of the fluid.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #17
TSny said:
But part (a) asks for the density of the fluid.
Yikes. You're right. I noted that, but then forgot all about it. :sorry:

That's the only part of the question that requires understanding buoyancy too! D'oh!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #18
Doc Al said:
Yikes. You're right. I noted that, but then forgot all about it.
I'm finding myself doing the same sort of thing more and more lately. I'm going to blame the hot, humid weather we're having. :woot:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Taniaz and Vibhor
  • #19
@Taniaz, I'm going to mark this one unsolved. Sorry that I was asleep at the wheel. (That's why we pay TSny the big bucks! :smile:)

OK, you correctly solved for the mass of the block. Now do a force analysis of the submerged block. Set up another equation. This time you'll need to make use of your knowledge of buoyant forces. The only unknown will end up being the density of the liquid.

Sorry for dropping the ball!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #20
Buoyant force=weight
ρgV=mg
so ρV=m but I'll get the same thing with this? V=volume of block and m=mass of block?
Oh there will be tension too?
so T+ρgV=mg?
 
Last edited:
  • #21
Taniaz said:
Buoyant force=weight
ρgV=mg
so ρV=m but I'll get the same thing with this? V=volume of block and m=mass of block?
No. The buoyant force will only equal the weight of the object when the object is in equilibrium without anything else supporting it (like a cord!).

Taniaz said:
Oh there will be tension too?
so T+ρgV=mg?
That's it. Good! Now you can solve for ρ.
 
  • #22
So tension is 25 N, g=10 m/s^2, V=0.003 m^3, m=7.5 kg
so solving for ρ= 1666 kg/m^3
 
  • #23
Taniaz said:
So tension is 25 N, g=10 m/s^2, V=0.003 m^3, m=7.5 kg
so solving for ρ= 1666 kg/m^3
Looks good.
 
  • #24
Great! Thank you so much Doc Al and TSny! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
18K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K