Block on a rough plane Coefficient of Kinetic Friction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A 3kg block sliding down a rough plane inclined at 27 degrees experiences an acceleration of 2.5 m/s². The coefficient of kinetic friction (μk) is calculated using the equation derived from the net forces acting on the block. The final calculation yields a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.074. The discussion confirms that the mass does not cancel out in this scenario, as both sides of the equation must maintain dimensional consistency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F = ma)
  • Basic trigonometry for resolving forces (sine and cosine functions)
  • Knowledge of frictional forces and coefficients
  • Familiarity with free-body diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of friction equations in physics
  • Learn about free-body diagram techniques for analyzing forces
  • Explore the effects of different angles on friction and acceleration
  • Investigate real-world applications of kinetic friction in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and engineers interested in mechanics, particularly those focusing on friction and motion analysis.

boognish
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
1. A 3kg block slides down a rough plane inclined at an angle of 27 degrees. If the acceleration of the block is 2.5 m/s/s find the coefficient of kinetic friction.



2. solving for components
Force Net = M x A
forces in the y direction: Fn - Fg cos 27 degrees = 0
forces in the x direction: M x G sin 27 degrees - Fk = M x A
Fk = coef-k x m x g cos 27 degrees




3. isolating Fk resolves to:
9.8 sin 27 degrees - 2.5 m/s = Fk
substituting for fk to resolve for coef of kinetic friction resolves to this:
9.8 sin 27 degrees - 2.5 m/s = mu-k x 3 kg x 9.8 cos 27 degrees
1.949 = mu-k x 26.196
mu-k = .074
 
Physics news on Phys.org
is this correct..? I am wondering if all the masses should cancel out in this equation or if I have it set up correctly
 
Your work is section 2 is fine.

9.8 sin 27 degrees - 2.5 m/s = Fk
You've divided the left-hand side by m, but not the right-hand side.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
828
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K