- #1

nite owl

- 2

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter nite owl
- Start date

- #1

nite owl

- 2

- 0

- #2

marcus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 24,770

- 791

No the blueshifts of some galaxies only correspond to small (few 100 km/s) random velocities---don't contradict the overall average pattern of recession rate.

If you really want to get to understand redshift and the standard cosmological model then a good thing to do is practice with this calculator

http://www.uni.edu/morgans/ajjar/Cosmology/cosmos.html

to get some experience of what recession rates (and distances) are associated with which redshifts.

To use it you first enter the three principal parameters in the three boxes over on the left labeled "matter fraction", "cosmo constant", and "Hubble". Standard numbers to use are .27, .73, and 71.

Then put in a redshift, like 8.5 (the redshift of a galaxy measured last year, since then some more distant galaxy may have been discovered) and press calculate.

It will give you the distances and recession rates.

You will see that the recession rates are mostly much larger than a few 100 km/s.

(Considering that 300 km/s is only 1/1000 of the speed of light!)

The distance definition commonly used by redshift calculators (like this and like Ned Wright's) is the same distance used in stating the Hubble Law v = H d

where v is the recession rate and d is the distance. It is the "freezeframe" distance you would measure by any ordinary means if you could freeze the expansion process, so that the distance would not change while you were trying to measure it.

Have a look at Morgan's "cosmos calculator" and see if works for you. Please let me know if you have any trouble.

The link is in my signature, or just google "cosmos calculator" and you'll get it.

- #3

Chronos

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 11,435

- 747

What blue shifted galaxies do you have in mind that are not members of the local group?

Share:

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 664

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 181

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 942

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 163

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 832

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 384

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 607

- Replies
- 20

- Views
- 486

- Replies
- 30

- Views
- 993

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 487