- #1
refrigerator
- 15
- 0
Referring to slides 3-4 (page 2) of this link: https://www.princeton.edu/~stengel/MAE331Lecture9.pdf
The author states the relationship between body rates [p q r] and Euler angle rates [φ_dot θ_dot ψ_dot]. I want to verify this but have been failing miserably...
My reasoning:
1) p, q, and r are angular rates about the body axes xB, yB, and zB.
2) φ, θ, and ψ are Euler angles about the intermediate axes x2, y1, and zI, respectively.
3) OK, so I just need to express xB, yB, and zB in terms of x2, y1, and zI, right?
4) p is trivial because xB already coincides with x2. Therefore, p = φdot.
5) When I do the same for yB, I get
yB = cosΦy1 + sinΦcosθzI + sinΦsinθx1.
This is awfully similar to the solution given, which is
q = cosΦ * θdot + sinΦcosθ * ψdot
What am I doing wrong? I've tried to find other sources online but they all just gloss over the derivation or present the result only.
Thank you in advance... I am completely at a loss and have been thinking unproductively about this for hours.[/SUB]
The author states the relationship between body rates [p q r] and Euler angle rates [φ_dot θ_dot ψ_dot]. I want to verify this but have been failing miserably...
My reasoning:
1) p, q, and r are angular rates about the body axes xB, yB, and zB.
2) φ, θ, and ψ are Euler angles about the intermediate axes x2, y1, and zI, respectively.
3) OK, so I just need to express xB, yB, and zB in terms of x2, y1, and zI, right?
4) p is trivial because xB already coincides with x2. Therefore, p = φdot.
5) When I do the same for yB, I get
yB = cosΦy1 + sinΦcosθzI + sinΦsinθx1.
This is awfully similar to the solution given, which is
q = cosΦ * θdot + sinΦcosθ * ψdot
What am I doing wrong? I've tried to find other sources online but they all just gloss over the derivation or present the result only.
Thank you in advance... I am completely at a loss and have been thinking unproductively about this for hours.[/SUB]