Bonding in Diborane: Unique 3c-2e Bonds & Hybridization

  • Thread starter Thread starter aim1732
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonding
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the unique bonding characteristics of diborane, particularly the presence of 3c-2e bonds and the implications of hybridization on bond angles. Participants explore theoretical models and structural interpretations related to the bonding in diborane, including comparisons to other molecular structures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that diborane features two 3c-2e bonds, with a bond angle of 120 degrees between terminal hydrogen atoms and the central boron atom, suggesting a possible sp2 hybridization.
  • Others argue that the 120-degree bond angle is not significant given the oversimplified model of bonding in diborane.
  • One participant points out that the bond angle difference is still noteworthy, drawing parallels to other strained systems like cyclobutane.
  • A later reply references a specific valence bond calculation to provide a more precise understanding of diborane's electronic structure.
  • Another participant reiterates the uniqueness of diborane's bonding and discusses the internal bond angles, suggesting that steric effects influence the observed bond angles.
  • Some propose an alternative model involving sp2 hybridization for terminal bonds and a rehybridization process, comparing it to ethane's bonding structure.
  • One participant mentions "banana bonds" in relation to the discussion, indicating a connection to more complex bonding scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of the bond angles and hybridization in diborane, with no clear consensus reached on the best model or interpretation of the bonding structure.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about hybridization and bond angles remain unresolved, and the discussion includes references to specific calculations and models that may not be universally accepted.

aim1732
Messages
428
Reaction score
2
The bonding in diborane is unique as it involves two 3c-2e bonds. Most books show the overlapping as between two sp3 orbitals of B atoms and s orbital of H atom.But the bond angle between the terminal H atoms and central B atom is 120, as if the B atom were sp2 hybrid. Any ideas?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
That's only a difference of 11 deg. Not much given that the model is incredibly oversimplified.
 
Hmmm.. But it's a difference still.
 
Of course there is a difference as in any stained system like e.g. cyclobutane or -propane.
For a precise valence bond calculation have a look e.g. here:

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/j100179a024
"Electronic structure of diborane and octahydrotriborate(1-): boron-hydrogen-boron bridges and closed boron-boron-boron bonds"
Maurizio Sironi, Mario Raimondi, David L. Cooper, Joseph Gerratt
J. Phys. Chem., 1991, 95 (26), pp 10617–10623
DOI: 10.1021/j100179a024
 
aim1732 said:
The bonding in diborane is unique as it involves two 3c-2e bonds. Most books show the overlapping as between two sp3 orbitals of B atoms and s orbital of H atom.But the bond angle between the terminal H atoms and central B atom is 120, as if the B atom were sp2 hybrid. Any ideas?
The bond angle being 120 deg between the outer H atoms is not such a big deal, since diborane does not have a (BH3)2 structure, like ethane.

The four bonds between the two B atoms and the two "internal" H atoms want to get close to a square, making the bond angle between the internal H atoms settle on some value between 90 deg (to reduce steric strains among the internal bonds) and 109.5 deg (from tetrahedral symmetry of the sp3 orbital). As it turns out, this internal H-B-H bonds angle is a reasonable 97 degrees. This reduction from the tetrahedral angle allows the exterior H-B-H bond to spread out farther than 109.5 deg. So, a number like 120 deg doesn't sound unreasonable. In short, the reason for the non-tetrahedral angle is that there are steric effects from the inside atoms forming a cyclic structure, just as Dr Du mentioned above.

That the angle is almost exactly the sp2 bond angle is just an unrelated coincidence.
 
Instead of an equal sp3 hybridization for all 4 bonds you could alternatively consider two sp2 hybrids for the terminal bonds and a rehybridization of the third sp2 with the p to form two sp5 hybrids which an opening angle of 101.5 degree. Something exactly similar is possible in the case of ethane where the sigma and pi bonds are rehybridized to form two banana bonds.
Would be nice to compare the two alternatives with an ab initio valence bond program like VB2000.
 
When I saw this question my thoughts immediately went to "bananna bonds". Really weird...
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
24K