A Bound states of an electron trapped in a dipole field

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the bound states of an electron in a dipole field, as studied by Alhaidari and colleagues. There is skepticism regarding the widespread use of the point dipole approximation, questioning its validity when an electron can be localized near the dipole size. The potential energy expression for two oppositely charged immovable centers may require a more accurate representation than a point dipole. The point dipole model is suggested to be a means to achieve analytical solutions, despite its limitations. Overall, the practicality of this model for real molecular systems is debated.
reterty
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
The problem of bound states of an electron trapped in a dipole field is being studied by Alhaidari and company. (See, for example, https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0707/0707.3510.pdf). It is not clear to me why the point dipole approximation is used everywhere in such calculations. Can't an electron in such a system be localized at distances of the order of a dipole size, where it is necessary to honestly, without Taylor, take an expression for the potential energy of a system of two oppositely charged immovable centers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess is that using a point dipole is the only way to get an analytical solution. It is an interesting toy problem, but I don't think anybody uses such a model for actual molecules.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and vanhees71
An antilinear operator ##\hat{A}## can be considered as, ##\hat{A}=\hat{L}\hat{K}##, where ##\hat{L}## is a linear operator and ##\hat{K} c=c^*## (##c## is a complex number). In the Eq. (26) of the text https://bohr.physics.berkeley.edu/classes/221/notes/timerev.pdf the equality ##(\langle \phi |\hat{A})|\psi \rangle=[ \langle \phi|(\hat{A}|\psi \rangle)]^*## is given but I think this equation is not correct within a minus sign. For example, in the Hilbert space of spin up and down, having...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
2K