A Bound states of an electron trapped in a dipole field

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the bound states of an electron in a dipole field, as studied by Alhaidari and colleagues. There is skepticism regarding the widespread use of the point dipole approximation, questioning its validity when an electron can be localized near the dipole size. The potential energy expression for two oppositely charged immovable centers may require a more accurate representation than a point dipole. The point dipole model is suggested to be a means to achieve analytical solutions, despite its limitations. Overall, the practicality of this model for real molecular systems is debated.
reterty
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
The problem of bound states of an electron trapped in a dipole field is being studied by Alhaidari and company. (See, for example, https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0707/0707.3510.pdf). It is not clear to me why the point dipole approximation is used everywhere in such calculations. Can't an electron in such a system be localized at distances of the order of a dipole size, where it is necessary to honestly, without Taylor, take an expression for the potential energy of a system of two oppositely charged immovable centers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess is that using a point dipole is the only way to get an analytical solution. It is an interesting toy problem, but I don't think anybody uses such a model for actual molecules.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and vanhees71
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...