Bound states of massless fermions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of massless fermions on the existence of bound states, specifically in the context of hydrogen atoms and quarks. It concludes that without the Higgs mechanism, bound states may not exist due to the lack of mass, which is crucial for stability. The conversation highlights the complexities of relativistic particle mathematics and the differences in physics that arise when considering massless particles, particularly in relation to chiral symmetry and mass gap issues.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and bound states
  • Familiarity with the Higgs mechanism and its role in particle mass
  • Knowledge of chiral symmetry and its implications in particle physics
  • Basic concepts of relativistic quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Higgs mechanism and its impact on particle mass
  • Study the mathematics of bound states in relativistic quantum mechanics
  • Explore chiral symmetry breaking and its effects on fermion mass
  • Investigate the properties of massless particles and their confinement in quantum field theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, particle physics, and theoretical physics, will benefit from this discussion, as well as students seeking to understand the implications of massless fermions on particle interactions.

JustinLevy
Messages
882
Reaction score
1
If I look at the energy of the hydrogen atom, the energy is proportional to the mass of the electron (or more precisely, the reduced mass). Does this mean that without a Higgs mechanism, there are no bound states of the hydrogen atom? (Or is it just an artifact of a non-relativistic theory that I see no bound states when I let the mass -> 0?)

Second question, if there aren't bound states for that reason, how general is this? For example, if the quarks were truly massless, would that prevent bound states of quarks as well? Or would there still be confinement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would certainly be a challenge to create a bound state with a massless particle. The mathematics of Bound states with highly relativistic particles is difficult and controversial and I don't believe there is agreement in the literature. Certainly it would have very different properties than hydrogen and would be highly unstable.

As for the quarks, well yea in reality even without a Higgs mechanism, you won't have exactly zero mass b/c of the chiral symmetry breaking and mass gap issues. But since the mass scales are completely different you'd have again, very different physics than you are used too.
 
Last edited:
Haelfix said:
even without a Higgs mechanism, you won't have exactly zero mass b/c of the chiral symmetry breaking and mass gap issues.
I'm not sure what you are referring to here, would you mind explaining a bit more to help me understand?

By chiral, do you mean left/right handed? I thought that was not a good symmetry at any energy (ie. it is not a spontaneously broken symmetry). As for mass gap, I've never really understood what motivates that expectation theoretically. Bosons don't necessarily have a mass gap, why should the fermions?
 
It is a spontaneous broken symmetry since you only have pseudoscalar mesons in nature, and no real scalar ones (i.e no positive parity partners for e.g. the pions)

This is a quite good (maybe a bit too technical) article about this:

http://www.fuw.edu.pl/~dobaczew/maub-42w/node10.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K