Bound states of Yukawa potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the critical inverse screening length (q) for bound states in a Yukawa potential, represented as V(r) = -\frac{e^2}{r}e^{-rq}. The criterion for bound states is established as \frac{2m}{hbar^2}\frac{|V_0|}{q^2} > 2.7, aligning with N.F. Mott's findings regarding the lattice spacing of hydrogen atoms in a metal-insulator transition. The participants emphasize the necessity of deriving the condition for no bound states as an essential quantum mechanics exercise, suggesting that solving the Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation (TISE) for the Yukawa potential can yield the required insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Yukawa potential and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly bound states
  • Knowledge of the Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation (TISE)
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics parameters such as mass (m) and reduced Planck's constant (hbar)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of bound state conditions for various potentials, focusing on the Yukawa potential
  • Learn how to solve the Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation (TISE) for different potential forms
  • Investigate the implications of the critical spacing in lattice structures for metal-insulator transitions
  • Explore the relationship between potential parameters and bound state energy levels in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers focusing on potential theory and phase transitions in condensed matter physics will benefit from this discussion.

drummerguy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Say you have a Yukawa potential (a.k.a. screened coulomb potential) V(r) = -\frac{e^2}{r}e^{-rq} where q is the inverse screening length, how would you find the critical q for having bound states? I'm working on reproducing N.F. Mott's argument about the critical spacing of a lattice of hydrogen atoms for a metal-insulator transition.

I realize any negative potential will have bound states, and the potential just as I have written it will have at least one bound state (i.e. if q goes to infinity the potential becomes a delta function well which always has one bound state), but my professor told me to derive the condition for no bound states (he said it was an 'elementary' quantum mechanics exercise).

I found one site http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qm/lectures/node69.html that says that the criterion for a bound state is \frac{2m}{hbar^2}\frac{|V_0|}{q^2} > 2.7 and this gives the same answer that Mott got for the lattice spacing. I just don't know how to get this criterion in the first place.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
drummerguy said:
Say you have a Yukawa potential (a.k.a. screened coulomb potential) V(r) = -\frac{e^2}{r}e^{-rq} where q is the inverse screening length, how would you find the critical q for having bound states? I'm working on reproducing N.F. Mott's argument about the critical spacing of a lattice of hydrogen atoms for a metal-insulator transition.

I realize any negative potential will have bound states, and the potential just as I have written it will have at least one bound state (i.e. if q goes to infinity the potential becomes a delta function well which always has one bound state), but my professor told me to derive the condition for no bound states (he said it was an 'elementary' quantum mechanics exercise).

I found one site http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qm/lectures/node69.html that says that the criterion for a bound state is \frac{2m}{hbar^2}\frac{|V_0|}{q^2} > 2.7 and this gives the same answer that Mott got for the lattice spacing. I just don't know how to get this criterion in the first place.

So can't you just solve the TISE for the potential you gave, and figure out the ZPE in terms of the particle mass and the parameters of the potential? You may have to make some simplifying assumptions that make sense in the limit you want to test, but I think it is doable. Then it should be trivial to find the minimum value of q that allows a single bound state.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K