Boundary conditions in String Theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around boundary conditions in RNS superstring theory, specifically the implications of varying the action and the potential for alternative boundary conditions for the fields involved. The scope includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning related to string theory.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether boundary conditions could be different from the standard ones, suggesting anti-periodic conditions for \(X^{\mu}\) and specific conditions for fermionic fields (\(\delta \psi_+ = \delta \psi_- = 0\)).
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the complexity of the question and whether it has been considered in the literature.
  • A participant asserts that the variations of the fields must be generic and nonzero, challenging the idea of setting \(\delta \psi_+ = \delta \psi_- = 0\).
  • It is stated that \(X^{\mu}\) cannot be anti-periodic, as it represents the string's position in spacetime, although a later reply suggests that from a 2D Field Theory perspective, this might be acceptable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of alternative boundary conditions, with some asserting that certain conditions cannot be applied while others propose their consideration. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the feasibility of these alternative boundary conditions.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the nature of the fields and the interpretation of boundary conditions in the context of string theory. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical implications of the proposed boundary conditions.

GargleBlast42
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I have this, probably quite simple, problem. In the RNS superstring, when varying the action, we obtain in general a term \int d\tau [X'_{\mu}\delta X^{\mu}|_{\sigma=\pi}-X'_{\mu}\delta X^{\mu}|_{\sigma=0} + (\psi_+ \delta \psi_+ - \psi_- \delta \psi_-)|_{\sigma=\pi}-(\psi_+ \delta \psi_+ - \psi_- \delta \psi_-)|_{\sigma=0}], where the notation should be standard (as e.g. in Becker-Becker-Schwarz).

My question is the following: couldn't one also take other boundary conditions as those that one takes usually? For example, couldn't X^{\mu} be anti-periodic (i.e. an antiperiodic closed string), or cuoldn't we take a boundary condition for the fermion in the form \delta \psi_+=\delta \psi_-=0? Can one show that there are no solutions to such boundary conditions (because nobody does that in a textbook)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry for bumping this, but I would at least like to know, if it is too difficult to answer (i.e. nobody has been considering such boundary conditions), or is it just that it's so obvious, that it's not worth replying to :-)? Thank you for any ideas.
 
Much beyond my pay grade...boundary conditions can be rather esoteric...somebody may yet answer,

good luck...
 
You cannot set \delta \psi_+ = \delta \psi_- = 0, because the entire point of varying the action is that the variations of the fields are generic (i.e., nonzero).

Also, X^\mu cannot be antiperiodic, because it is just an ordinary number. Either the string is closed or it isn't. Remember that X^\mu simply describes the string's position/configuration in spacetime.
 
Ben Niehoff said:
You cannot set \delta \psi_+ = \delta \psi_- = 0, because the entire point of varying the action is that the variations of the fields are generic (i.e., nonzero).

Also, X^\mu cannot be antiperiodic, because it is just an ordinary number. Either the string is closed or it isn't. Remember that X^\mu simply describes the string's position/configuration in spacetime.

Sorry, I meant of course \delta \psi_+|_{\sigma=0/\pi} = \delta \psi_-|_{\sigma=0/\pi} = 0.

With the antiperiodicity - well yes, you couldn't interpret the X's as space-time dimensions, but from the point of view of the 2D Field Theory it would be okay, right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K