Branched suction pipe foR a pump

  • Thread starter Thread starter prasan_y2k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pipe Pump Suction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the performance issues of a 12 Volt DC Rotary Vane Pump connected to three tanks via a branched suction pipe system. Participants explore potential reasons for the low discharge rate observed, which is significantly below the pump's design capacity. The conversation includes considerations of pump type, suction line configuration, and the impact of tank interconnection on flow rates.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the type of pump and assumes it is a centrifugal pump, suggesting that connecting the tanks may introduce more friction losses.
  • Another participant clarifies that the pump is a 12 Volt DC Rotary Vane Pump and expresses confusion about how interconnecting the tanks would affect frictional losses.
  • Concerns are raised about the speed of the pump, with suggestions that increasing the speed could improve discharge rates, although the participant notes that increasing voltage is not feasible.
  • Some participants argue that the pump's design as a positive displacement (PD) pump means suction should not be a significant issue, and that flow may be choked by the small diameter pipe at the junction.
  • There is a suggestion that using a single suction pipe could improve efficiency, but the expected change may not be substantial.
  • Questions are posed regarding the motor's drive system and electrical requirements, indicating a need for further investigation into the pump's operation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of suction line configuration and pump speed on discharge rates. There is no consensus on the best approach to resolve the low discharge issue, and multiple competing perspectives remain regarding the effectiveness of proposed changes.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the uncertainty about the pump's operational parameters, the effects of pipe diameter on flow, and the specific electrical requirements of the motor. The discussion does not resolve these uncertainties.

prasan_y2k
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A PUMP OF 0.25HP IS CONNECTED IN THE ABOVE FASHION (REF ATTACHMENT) TO THREE TANKS BY MEANS OF A SINGLE SUCTION PIPE. THE SINGLE SUCTION PIPE IS FURTHER BRANCHED TO THREE SUCTION PIPES, ONE EACH FOR THREE TANKS.
THE DESIGN DISCHARGE CAPACITY OF THE PUMP IS APPROXIMATELY 45 LIT/MIN. BUT PRACTICALLY, AS PER THE ABOVE ARRANGEMENT, THE DISCHARGE RATE IS SHOWN TO BE VERY LOW (APPROX 8-10 LIT/MIN). HOW CAN WE INCREASE THE DISCHARGE RATE OF THE PUMP??
IF WE INTERCONNECT THE TANKS FROM BOTTOM AND KEEP A SINGLE SUCTION PIPE AND REMOVE THE BRANCHING, WILL THERE BE AN INCRESE IN DISCHARGE RATE OF THE PUMP?
Given: Height of the pump from tank base: 1.5m
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
First, what type of pump is it? I'm assuming it's a centrifugal pump, and that's what the rest of this reply will be based on.

I don't believe that would help (connecting the tanks), especially since the reentrants would introduce more friction losses in your available suction head.

Can you increase the speed of the pump? It doesn't sound like you are having cavitation problems, or running the pump dry. Just sounds like you are getting low flow.

Do you hear any strange noises in the pump? Any vibration? Any pulsing in the discharge lines?

Generally we want to keep our suction lines large. When the three lines come together, do you increase the line size of the pump suction?
 
The pump is a 12 Volt DC Rotary Vane Pump. The pump is running on a 12 volt battery, so I cannot figure a way out to increase the speed. There is no strange sound or vibration in the pump. When the three lines come together, the pipe dia remains same (1").

I am still confused as how the interconnection of tanks will introduce more frictional losses in suction head. The interconnection of tanks (by means of 1/2" pipes) will make the suction line without branches, and make the 3 tanks behave as one.

Also, I would like to add that the discharge hose is 100 feet long and is kept on a hose reel. Nevertheless, even if the entire hose is taken off the hose reel, there is hardly any noticable change in discharge rate.
 
Yea, I don't see friction being your main concern here anyway. I don't think modifying that will change your system, it's a PD pump afterall.

I think speed here is your biggest concern. I would bet that your pump is not spinning fast enough.
 
Thanks for your reply.

The pump is wired directly from a 12V auxillary car battery and the battery is fully charged. Battery charges itself from the car's alternator. I don't see any way how to increase voltage, as that may lead to increasing speed.

But won't the pump make less effort in suction from one pipe(later after interconnecting the tanks) rather than three (as in the present case)?
 
It's a PD pump, suction isn't an issue, really. At a given speed, the pump will provide a certain capacity, basically no matter what. PD pumps are very good at suction head.

The only think I can think of is somehow the flow is being choked in the small diameter pipe when they all meet.

With that said, one suction pipe will probably make it more efficient, anyway. But not noticeably. If it isn't very expensive, go ahead and change the set up, and use a larger diameter pipe, reduce at the pump suction if you need 1 inch, just be sure to use the right type of reducer, or do it a few diameters upstream.

What type of drive is it from the motor to the pump? No room for a gear assembly or small sheaves?

What are the electrical requirements of the motor you are using for the pump? Do you have them available?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
28K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K