Brokenness of Scientific Method: Up to Half of Papers May Be Wrong

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the perceived flaws and limitations of the scientific method, particularly in the context of its application in physics and other fields. Participants explore issues such as data integrity, the reliability of published studies, and the broader implications of these concerns on scientific inquiry.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern that many scientific papers may be fundamentally flawed due to various issues, including conflicts of interest and data falsification.
  • One participant critiques the historical application of the scientific method in physics, citing Edwin Hubble's redshift data as an example of guesswork in scientific reporting.
  • There is a suggestion that the scientific method's reliability is questionable, particularly regarding its ability to be verified by itself, raising philosophical questions about its foundational assumptions.
  • Another participant notes the complexities of the scientific method, referencing Gödel's incompleteness theorems to argue that assumptions within any reasoning system cannot be fully verified from within that system.
  • Concerns are raised about the replication crisis in science, with specific reference to studies related to tobacco and Covid-19, highlighting potential motivations behind certain research findings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there are significant issues with the scientific method and its application, but multiple competing views remain regarding the extent and nature of these flaws. The discussion does not reach a consensus on how to address these issues or the implications for scientific practice.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various limitations in the scientific method, including the potential for fabricated data and the challenges in replicating studies. There is also a recognition that certain areas, such as ethics and consciousness, may not be amenable to scientific inquiry.

Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Excellent read on the brokenness of the scientific method: there are many, many issues, ranging from conflicts of interest, data falsification, lack of proper incentives, abysmal lack of statistical knowledge, etc. As many as HALF of scientific papers published today might simply be wrong!

In summary: the idea of the scientific method is good. Its implementation right now is fraught with egregious errors, many and varied. Do not just trust anyone in a white lab coat.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there are any number of flaws in applications of Physics as well. (For example, the original data from Edwin Hubble was presented correctly but his best fit line for the redshift problem was completely guess work and should not have been presented as it was. More data was required to make any kind of argument. (And don't get me started on "cold fusion!") That's a nice article. Thanks for posting!

Now here's a thought. We assume that the scientific method can be used to investigate just about everything. The idea is that we should (if we have the technology) be able to set up the experiment such that a preschooler should be able to push a button and get the same results as anyone else. But is this true? Can the scientific method be used to verify the scientific method?

Ackbach said:
Do not just trust anyone in a white lab coat.
I'm a hard core theorist. I never believe them!

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Yes, there are any number of flaws in applications of Physics as well. (For example, the original data from Edwin Hubble was presented correctly but his best fit line for the redshift problem was completely guess work and should not have been presented as it was. More data was required to make any kind of argument. (And don't get me started on "cold fusion!") That's a nice article. Thanks for posting!

Very welcome!

topsquark said:
Now here's a thought. We assume that the scientific method can be used to investigate just about everything.

Well, many things, at least. I haven't heard anyone claim that you can investigate ethics scientifically. And consciousness is a standard topic that has evaded all scientific inquiries for a long time - I personally don't think science is going to make much progress there.

topsquark said:
The idea is that we should (if we have the technology) be able to set up the experiment such that a preschooler should be able to push a button and get the same results as anyone else. But is this true? Can the scientific method be used to verify the scientific method?

That's a great question! I would say, on the whole, not. All reasoning systems make assumptions, and typically those assumptions cannot themselves be verified within the reasoning system (other than, if possible, showing consistency). See Godel's work for why that is. Even so simple a logical system as first-order logic plus the axioms of arithmetic is incomplete: there are true statements within the system that cannot be proved from within the system. Godel went outside the system to show that the statement was true, and showed that the system itself could not prove it.

Surely if you add in all the complexities and uncertainties of an inductive process such as the scientific method, this problem would only get worse.

topsquark said:
I'm a hard core theorist. I never believe them!

-Dan

Couldn't help but smile when I saw that. Same here! Just ask my wife how often I'm wrong. ;)
 
 
This case was really a blatant fabrication of data. But the causes of the replication crisis are usually more nuanced. Personally I've had my antennas up for fabricated studies since the start of the pandemic. There have been a few studies claiming that tobacco smoking or nicotine has protective effects against Covid-19. At least one of these studies have been shown to have serious flaws, but there have been more studies published and even nicotine trials in France. What I find suspicious is that this is happening at a time when the tobacco industry is struggling, and even tried to register tobacco as an "essential item" in many countries to bypass laws on buying essential items only during the pandemic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
12K