Buckyball Diffraction Thru a Grating.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the diffraction of buckyballs, which are molecules made of 60 carbon atoms, through a grating. The scenario includes calculating the position of intensity maxima and relating the energy of buckyballs to their wavelength.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the wavelength of the buckyballs and the distance to the detector for observing intensity maxima. There is also exploration of using the deBroglie wavelength in the context of optics.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the path difference and its relation to the wavelength. Others have suggested using the deBroglie wavelength as a potential approach, indicating a productive exploration of concepts.

Contextual Notes

There is some uncertainty regarding the assumptions made about the equivalence of momentum between buckyballs and photons, as well as the interpretation of the wavelength in the context of the problem.

TMO
Messages
45
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Buckyballs are soccerball-shaped molecules consisting of 60 carbon atoms (Mass of C60 = 1.2024×10-24 kg) with an approximate diameter of 1 nm. A beam of buckyballs with each molecule carrying a kinetic energy of 0.60 eV is normally incident on a grating with a slit with of 10 nm and 105 lines per centimeter. We detect these molecules with suitable equipment placed at a distance of 1.5 m behind the grating. Let the wavelength of these buckyballs be λ.

(1) How far do we have to move the detector from the path of incidence to find the first maximum of intensity?

(2) If a photon had the same energy E as a buckyball of momentum p, what would be its wavelength λφ? Give an algebraic answer in terms of mC60, h, and c only.


Homework Equations



(I) d sin(θ) = ±mλ, where m is an integer.
(II) p2/(2m) = E
(III) pφ = E/c
(IV) E = hc/λφ

The Attempt at a Solution



For (1), the maximae occur at integral multiples of the wavelength, so the detector should be moved λ wavelengths away (or so I think).

For (2), cross multiply equation (III) to get E = pc. Set this equal to (I) yielding p = 2mC60c. Plug equation (IV) into (III) yielding p = h/λφ. Therefore 2mC60c = h/λφ. Trivial algebra gives the desired solution λφ = h/(2mC60c)

My solution to problem (1) feels too simple to be right, and my solution to problem (2) assumes that p = pφ, and I'm unsure as to whether such an equivalence is correct. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For (1), the maximae occur at integral multiples of the wavelength, so the detector should be moved λ wavelengths away (or so I think).
Nope - the path difference has to be an integer number of wavelengths. That's why ##d\sin\theta=m\lambda##
 
Okay then. Let ρ be the line density per meter. Then the distance between each line should be given by ρ-1. Thus ρ-1 sin(θ) ≈ ρ-1ΔyR-1 = λ. ∴ Δy = λρR.
 
Why not just use the deBroglie wavelength of the buckyball and proceed as for optics?
 
Why not just use the deBroglie wavelength of the buckyball and proceed as for optics?

When I said in my original post, "Let the wavelength of these buckyballs be λ," I was referring to the deBroglie wavelength of the buckyball. Furthermore, I am referring to the same lambda in the following quoted post as in the original post:
TMO said:
Okay then. Let ρ be the line density per meter. Then the distance between each line should be given by ρ-1. Thus ρ-1 sin(θ) ≈ ρ-1ΔyR-1 = λ. ∴ Δy = λρR.
 
Last edited:
Oh excuse me - I misread the relations.
Note: people marking exams can do that too - which is why you annotate your working.

Then what's the problem?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K