Builds an anti-nucleus composed of anti-proton and anti-neutron

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JustinLevy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical construction of an anti-nucleus composed of anti-protons and anti-neutrons, referred to as "Nucleitronium." The participants explore the implications of its mass and the resulting Bohr radius, suggesting that the decay rate may be influenced by the composite nature of the particles and their color charge. A rough estimate indicates that the decay could occur in the ballpark of 10^-19 seconds, based on wavefunction overlap and orbital calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and particle physics
  • Familiarity with concepts of anti-matter, specifically anti-protons and anti-neutrons
  • Knowledge of Bohr model and atomic structure
  • Basic grasp of decay rates and wavefunction overlap
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and behavior of anti-protons and anti-neutrons
  • Study the Bohr model in greater detail, focusing on its application to composite particles
  • Explore decay processes in particle physics, particularly for composite particles
  • Investigate advanced quantum mechanics techniques for calculating decay rates
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in particle physics, and students interested in the properties of anti-matter and theoretical nuclear structures.

JustinLevy
Messages
882
Reaction score
1
humanino said:
Therefore, if one builds an anti-nucleus composed of anti-proton and anti-neutron, and puts it into orbit around a regular nucleus, one sould obtain some kind of stable "Nucleitronium" :confused:
I thought that was a neat idea. However, the mass is greater and thus the equivalent "bohr radius" would be much smaller. Maybe the two effects cancel (or maybe this decays even faster than positronium). I'm not sure how to calculate the decay rate since the particles are composite, have color charge, and is more energic with more decay products possible.

I'm curious now. Anyone know which would decay faster? Is there some kind of shortcut / handwavy back of the envelope method we can use here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The Bohr radius of protonium is ~10^-3 of hydrogen, or about 100 proton radii. I'd start with the wavefunction overlap, which is going to tell you that the antiproton spends ~1% of its time inside the proton, so you get something like 100 orbits before decay. Each orbit will take ~(2pi)r/c time, or maybe 10^-21 s. So I would guess the ballpark is 10^-19 seconds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K