Graduate Burn efficiency in Inertial Confinement Fusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter lia2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion Inertial
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on two definitions of burn-up fraction in inertial confinement fusion: the fraction of the target mass that burns and a fraction based on number densities. Participants explore the relationship between these definitions, particularly in non-equimolar cases. The importance of maintaining stoichiometry in the D+T fusion reaction is emphasized, as it affects the likelihood of fusion interactions. The conversation highlights that side reactions, such as D+D and T+T, have lower probabilities compared to the primary D+T reaction. Understanding these concepts is crucial for advancing fusion energy toward breakeven and gain.
lia2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
we have two different definitions for burn-up fraction related to inertial confinement fusion

the fraction of the target mass that burns

a fraction that is calculated on number densities
we have two different definitions for burn-up fraction related to inertial confinement fusion

the fraction of the target mass that burns

a fraction that is calculated on number densities

how are these two related in non-equimolar case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lia2 said:
TL;DR Summary: we have two different definitions for burn-up fraction related to inertial confinement fusion

the fraction of the target mass that burns

a fraction that is calculated on number densities

how are these two related in non-equimolar case?
One would consider the stoichiometry of the mixture. The key reaction is D+T (d+t), other side reactions would be d+d or t+t, which both have lower cross-sections (probability of interaction by fusion). So, one would try to maintain stoichiometry with nd = nt, usually as a mixed gas, or as DT molecule, which would then dissociate when entering the hot plasma.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
687
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K