Understanding Nuclear Fusion Cross Section Diagrams

In summary: This effect is not included in your calculation, but it significantly affects the fusion rate.In summary, the conversation discusses a simulation of a particle collision that shows the nuclear fusion reaction rate of deuterium at different densities and temperatures. The participant is having trouble understanding the interpretation of nuclear fusion cross section diagrams and how they factor in tunneling and the presence of electrons. They also question the accuracy of their simulation, specifically regarding the effects of coulomb repulsion and the exclusion of the tail of the kinetic energy distribution in their calculations.
  • #1
TL;DR Summary
How are nuclear fusion cross section diagrams supposed to be interpreted?
I'm working on programming a particle simulation that visually shows the nuclear fusion reaction rate of deuterium at different densities and temperatures, but I'm having trouble understanding exactly how nuclear fusion cross section diagrams are supposed to be interpreted. (The simulation assumes the particles are just deuterium atoms with one elementary positive charge each, and the only force acting on them is the coulomb repulsion force.)

Particularly, if I simulate (in 1D) one deuterium atom moving towards another stationary deuterium atom at 2 million meters per second (which corresponds to about 107 keV), the closest the atoms get during the collision before moving apart again is 65 femtometers.

According to the attached diagram, the fusion cross section at 107 keV is 8e-30 m^2, which I believe implies that if one deuterium atom gets within the radius of a sphere with this cross sectional area of the other deuterium atom, the atoms should fuse. However, an area of 8e-30 m^2 requires the atoms to get within 1.60 femtometers of one another, which is much closer than the coulomb repulsion allows the particles to get in my simulation. I am pretty confident in my math and numerical integration of the forces acting on the particles in my simulation so I doubt that they are at fault. How can the fusion cross section radius be smaller than the closest distance coulomb repulsion allows the particles to get during a collision?

I understand that tunneling is the major pathway by which fusion reactions occur but I assumed tunneling is factored into creating the fusion cross section diagrams. Is this incorrect?

Alternatively, I ignored all effects from the electrons (which I assume is probably a poor assumption since they likely play a non negligible role in the fusion process), so is that possibly to blame?
 

Attachments

  • Fusion Cross Section.png
    Fusion Cross Section.png
    11.7 KB · Views: 197
  • Like
Likes Drakkith
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You're given the total reaction cross section. The reactions per second per volume, ##f##, is then given by

##f = \frac{N^2}{2}\langle \sigma v\rangle##

where ##\langle \sigma v\rangle## is the thermal average of the particle speed, ##v##, times the cross section at that energy, ##\sigma##. ##N## is the particle number per volume.
 
  • Like
Likes BrandonBerchtold
  • #3
BrandonBerchtold said:
I understand that tunneling is the major pathway by which fusion reactions occur but I assumed tunneling is factored into creating the fusion cross section diagrams.
Correct, but it is not considered in your simulation, that's why you get a difference.
If the protons approach each other to 70 fm then you have a small chance of fusion happening due to tunneling. The chance is small, but the impact parameter can be much larger than 2 fm. An integral would produce the cross section you have.

There is an additional effect you didn't consider yet: What you use is the average kinetic energy. The fusion probability increases rapidly with increasing energy. Fusion processes mainly happen in the tail of the kinetic energy distribution, where both deuterium nuclei have above average energy.
 
  • Like
Likes BrandonBerchtold

Suggested for: Understanding Nuclear Fusion Cross Section Diagrams

Replies
31
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top