Burning Calories with Stairs: How Many Floors for a Big Mac?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jerzy986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calories Mac
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the number of floors one needs to climb to burn the calories in a Big Mac, which is stated to be 540 calories. The problem involves concepts from physics, particularly potential energy and calorie conversion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calorie content of a Big Mac and the potential energy formula, P.E = mgh, as a starting point for calculations. There are questions about the adequacy of the provided data and the assumptions involved in estimating the number of floors.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights on the importance of estimation in physics problems, while others have expressed frustration with the lack of data. There is a recognition that the original poster's attempts yield a wide range of answers, and further exploration of estimates is encouraged.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of calculating an exact answer due to limited information and varying interpretations of the problem. There is also mention of the original poster's experience with their physics teacher, which adds a layer of context to the discussion.

jerzy986
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1) How many floors do you need to walk up to burn the calories in a big mac?
no variable given, that's it!


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


alright, so by looking things up on the internet, I've found that a big mac is 540 calories.
-big mac is 2260.44 J

-using stairs as 8in distance between, and 12in long, its 14.42in distance for each one, 12 steps in a flight, 173.06in= 4.40m per floor

ive tried a lot of other things, but there is no way I am getting the right answer, any help would be MUCH appreciated. thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The term 'calorie' as used when referring to food is actually a kilocalorie. I.e. 1000 of the calories you are referring to. Correct for that.
 
You cannot expect to calculate anything from so little data. You could use the formula for potential energy, P.E = mgh and set that equal to energy from a big mac, but climbing the stairs requires far more than simply increasing potential energy.
 
dick, thank you for that information, i will re-calculate some things...

arunbg, i understand that there's so little info. But that's why my physics teacher is well, let's say "not that great." just make sure not to take professor Chen at UNF...
 
arunbg said:
You cannot expect to calculate anything from so little data. You could use the formula for potential energy, P.E = mgh and set that equal to energy from a big mac, but climbing the stairs requires far more than simply increasing potential energy.

You can calculate something. You look up as much as you can and guesstimate the rest. You can determine that it's not 10 floors, nor is it a million floors. Questions like this are extremely important and challenging. It doesn't mean your professor is "not great". The skill of being able to estimate something without knowing all the numbers and fitting it into a standard problem template is really valuable.
 
Dick said:
You can calculate something. You look up as much as you can and guesstimate the rest. You can determine that it's not 10 floors, nor is it a million floors. Questions like this are extremely important and challenging. It doesn't mean your professor is "not great". The skill of being able to estimate something without knowing all the numbers and fitting it into a standard problem template is really valuable.
Agreed, I didn't mean "anything" in that sense. From the OP's post, I was getting the impression that he was looking for an exact answer, which is not possible.
 
Dick, i understand the importance of problems like these, and also that it is not politically correct to regard a professor in a certain manner. Unfortunetly, i have spent beyond numerous hours with my study group this sem. dealing with this teacher, and every student feels the same way :(.

anyways, back to the problem. Through many different approaches, I keep getting answers anywhere from 2 and 249-400 flights, which would seem far too many in order to burn a big mac's worth of calories. Does anyone have any other insight that may help??

also, this forum is great! too bad I didn't stumble upon it earlier, although it will help this summer with physics 2 lol
 
2 floors is way too low. Hundreds of floors seems about right. You'd be surprised how much work it takes to burn off a big mac. Write down the parts you used to make your estimate. Now google around for another answer to see how close you came. One site I found says 1 big mac=about 60 minutes of vigorous stair climbing. How many floors can you climb in 60 minutes, vigorously? There's another estimate question for you. But 249-400 seems about right. Maybe a little high, but it's not crazy.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
25K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K