ray4758026
- 4
- 0
Would it ever be possible to make a synthetic hydrocarbon that wouldn't produce harmful by products.

The discussion revolves around the possibility of creating synthetic hydrocarbons that do not produce harmful byproducts when burned. It explores the implications of combustion processes, the types of byproducts generated, and potential methods for improving hydrocarbon utilization.
Participants express differing views on the nature of byproducts produced from hydrocarbon combustion, with some asserting that complete combustion yields only water and carbon dioxide, while others note the potential for harmful emissions like NOx compounds. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the feasibility of creating hydrocarbons that do not produce harmful byproducts.
The discussion does not resolve the assumptions regarding the definitions of "harmful byproducts" or the conditions under which combustion occurs, which may affect the outcomes discussed.

Unfortunately, the most common method of doing that, steam reforming of methane, still produces carbon dioxide and/or monoxide. If you can find a way to generate hydrogen while producing only, say, solid carbon, you will become very rich...chemisttree said:Yes. If the hydrocarbon easily gave up hydrogen and the hydrogen were used to power a fuel cell, no 'harmful' byproducts would be produced. It would be an advantage to be able to recycle the hydrocarbon and reduce it back to the original hydrocarbon.
russ_watters said:When you burn a hydrocarbon, you get water and carbon dioxide if your combustion is complete and your fuel is pure.
russ_watters said:If you can find a way to generate hydrogen while producing only, say, solid carbon, you will become very rich...