A "neat set of reactions" that makes fuel on Mars

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and scientific basis of a fictional chemical process described in the book "The Martian" by Andy Weir, which claims that a set of reactions using hydrogen and the Martian atmosphere can produce a significant amount of fuel. Participants explore various chemical reactions, their outputs, and the energy requirements involved in such processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the accuracy of the claim that 1 kg of hydrogen can yield 13 kg of fuel, noting that known reactions like the Sabatier reaction produce significantly less fuel.
  • Another participant mentions hydrogen peroxide as a potential fuel source, suggesting it may relate to the processes discussed.
  • A participant calculates that the reaction of CO2 with hydrogen could produce carbon monoxide and water, but raises concerns about the extreme temperatures required and the feasibility of using carbon monoxide as fuel.
  • There is a consensus that all mentioned processes require an energy input, with a participant emphasizing the need for an energy source for any synthesis.
  • One participant speculates that the author might be referring to syntheses of benzene, suggesting further research into that area.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the chemical processes mentioned, with no consensus on the feasibility of achieving the claimed fuel yield from hydrogen on Mars. Multiple competing models and reactions are discussed without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the energy requirements of the processes and the need for further exploration of the chemical reactions involved, including potential byproducts and their implications.

sciencegem
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm reading The Martian by Andy Weir (fantastic book). A character, describing how a Mars mission works, says of fueling their ascent vehicle:

"Through a neat set of chemical reactions with the Martian atmosphere, for every kilogram of hydrogen you bring to Mars, you can make thirteen kilograms of fuel. It's a slow process, though. It takes twenty-four months to fill the tank."

Usually I don't concern myself much with the scientific accuracy of particulars in SciFi, but this author took great pains to be accurate so I don't believe he pulled those numbers out of a hat. I'm assuming by "Martian atmosphere" he means CO2, the fact that they're using hydrogen makes me think they're creating hydrocarbons. Assuming they use product oxygen as fuel as well as the hydrocarbons (would that work?? I really know nothing of this stuff), I can't figure out what "neat set of chemical reactions" gets the Mars mission nearly 13kg of fuel for every 1kg of hydrogen. Does anyone have any ideas?

Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I'm not sure but in Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars series, the fuel they used on Mars was Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2). Maybe they're related.
 
Nothing I can think of produces 13 kg per 1 kg of hydrogen.

Sabatier reaction - producing CH4 - yields either 2 or 4 kg of methane per 1 kg of hydrogen used (depends on whether you assume the byproduct to be oxygen, or water).

Hydrogen peroxide production yields almost 17 kg of the compound per 1 kg of hydrogen used (unless there are some byproducts in which hydrogen is lost, that could account for the final ratio o 1:13).

Production of hydrazine yields up to 8 kg per each kg of hydrogen.
 
Thanks guys! Never thought of hydrogen peroxide...I'm assuming the oxygen would come from the carbon dioxide in Mar's atmosphere? Where'd the carbon go?One reaction I found would produce carbon monoxide and oxygen, and if I've calculated things right there'd be more than 13kg of carbon monoxide and oxygen for every kg of hydrogen (CO2 + H2 -> CO +H2O). Problem is it appears this reaction would involve extreme temperatures (400C) and the electrolysis of the water to free the oxygen. Also there's only +13kg of fuel if carbon monoxide can be used as fuel. What's the feasibility of this?
 
Neither of the processes mentioned is "free" - they all require input of the energy. Where does the energy come from is another problem, but you can be sure you need an energy source in all possible cases. 400 °C is not that high for an industrial synthesis.
 
sciencegem said:
great pains to be accurate so I don't believe he pulled those numbers out of a hat.
You don't really want to know from where they came.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sciencegem, Chestermiller and phinds
Thanks for all the input guys! I'll look up benzene syntheses. Also for any future readers of this thread I found this very interesting: http://web.stanford.edu/~cantwell/Recent_publications/Boiron_AIAA_2013-3899.pdf
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K