News Bush's Stand on North Korea: A Joke?

  • Thread starter Thread starter turbo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on President Bush's approach to North Korea, particularly his refusal to engage in direct diplomacy after labeling the country as part of the "Axis of Evil." Critics argue that his "go it alone" strategy has alienated the U.S. from the international community and undermined efforts to address North Korea's nuclear ambitions. The conversation highlights the contradiction in Bush's call for international support while simultaneously rejecting bilateral talks, which some believe could be crucial for effective negotiation. Participants express concern that the administration's reliance on sanctions and military options has squandered goodwill and failed to yield results, suggesting that diplomacy should be prioritized to prevent further escalation. The debate also touches on the historical context of previous agreements with North Korea and the complexities of engaging with a nation perceived as a rogue state. Ultimately, the need for a more collaborative and diplomatic approach is emphasized as essential for addressing the challenges posed by North Korea.
  • #31
Astro, could you throw in the link to the article?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Gokul43201 said:
Astro, could you throw in the link to the article?

North Korea sells arms to Ethiopia with U.S. OK

John Bolton was right about something for once.

It does reflect a more pragmatic approach to foreign policy, but this particular deal hurts anti-nuclear proliferation more than it helps in Somalia.
 
  • #33
Not to deflect this thread, and maybe it should become a new one addressing my question which is: has there been any instance in the past 100 years where we supported a gov't that was socialist or communist? By supported I do not mean providing financial aid or other inducements? I mean simply engaging in reasonable negotiations without threat of force, like you might with a neighbor across the fence in the backyard. Heaven help me, i don't see it. I remember the SALT talks with USSR, which might remotely fall under this definition. Help me, because I have seen neither a peace dividend nor a more stable world after USSR ceased to be the bad guy. Hell now the French and Germans are bad guys because they don't completely accept our positions on foreign policy. Proliferation via Packistan has made the world more dangerous. Now they are a friend with even greater exchange of technology in the offing.

The Irani's are now trumpeting their 300 centrifuges to produce "energy".
Where did we go wrong?
 
  • #34
denverdoc said:
The Irani's are now trumpeting their 300 centrifuges to produce "energy".
Where did we go wrong?
We have gone wrong every time monied interests in control of aspects of our government have chosen profit and expediency instead of ethics, morality, and sound policies regarding the future of the human race. Whenever a politician tells us that we must aggressively oppose another country on the basis of ideology or some perceived threat, it's time to take off the blinders and start following the money. Jingoism and flag-waving are the clearest signs that our politicians are engaging in behavior that is detrimental to most of us, and financially beneficial to their handlers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K