- #31
Polly
- 94
- 0
revelator said:
North Korea is not the boil.Should the World Intervene in North Korea?
- Context: News
- Thread starter russ_watters
- Start date
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the question of whether the world should intervene in North Korea, particularly in light of its humanitarian crisis and the potential military implications. Participants explore various aspects including moral, ethical, practical, and political considerations, as well as comparisons to the Iraq war.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Political reasoning
- Historical context
Main Points Raised
- One participant argues that the humanitarian crisis in North Korea, with millions potentially facing starvation, necessitates intervention, contrasting it with historical figures like Stalin and Pol Pot.
- Another participant questions the financial implications of a military intervention in North Korea, suggesting it could be more expensive than the Iraq war.
- Some participants express skepticism about the feasibility of a successful intervention, citing the potential for high civilian casualties and the current state of the US military.
- There are differing views on whether the world would support such an intervention, with some believing it could be seen as a moral action against dictatorship, while others fear it would exacerbate anti-American sentiment.
- Concerns are raised about the US's financial capacity to engage in another costly war, with references to national debt and the economic burden on future generations.
- One participant expresses a belief that the US should have intervened in North Korea instead of Iraq, indicating a preference for addressing what they see as a more pressing issue.
- Discrepancies in estimates of the financial costs of the Iraq war are discussed, with some participants citing figures as high as 7 trillion dollars, while others suggest lower estimates around 150 billion.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of opinions on the necessity and implications of intervention in North Korea, with no consensus reached. There are competing views on the moral justification, potential costs, and likelihood of international support.
Contextual Notes
Participants reference various estimates and opinions regarding the costs of military interventions and the humanitarian situation in North Korea, highlighting the uncertainty and complexity of the topic. There is also confusion regarding the distinction between national debt and war costs.
Who May Find This Useful
This discussion may be of interest to those exploring international relations, humanitarian intervention, military ethics, and the geopolitical implications of US foreign policy.
North Korea is not the boil.- #32
kat
- 42
- 0
Yeah,...okay.Polly said:
Similar threads
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 4 ·
- · Replies 3 ·
- · Replies 29 ·
- · Replies 27 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 28 ·
- · Replies 29 ·
- · Replies 10 ·
- · Replies 6 ·