But how does something start moving?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Line_112
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the curvature of spacetime in general relativity (GTR) and its implications for motion. The contributor argues that curvature is merely geometry and does not exert force, leading to a misunderstanding of how objects move within spacetime. They emphasize that while objects may appear motionless in space, they are always moving through time, which is a critical aspect of GTR. The thread concludes by highlighting the importance of understanding the time component in spacetime to grasp the principles of general relativity accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity (GTR)
  • Familiarity with the concept of spacetime
  • Basic knowledge of geometry and its application in physics
  • Awareness of motion and forces in classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of general relativity and its mathematical framework
  • Explore the concept of spacetime and its implications for motion
  • Learn about the role of gravity as a curvature of spacetime
  • Investigate common misconceptions about general relativity and their clarifications
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental concepts of general relativity and spacetime dynamics.

Line_112
Messages
57
Reaction score
3
In my opinion, the curvature of space is geometry, not force. Geometry determines the path along which a body will move, regardless of its speed. It is no coincidence that the theory of relativity speaks of the geometry of space. That is, if we proceed from the general theory of relativity, then a body caught in the curvature of space will simply change its trajectory of motion, regardless of how fast it moves. And if it is initially motionless, then it will remain so. In reality, bodies begin to move vertically downwards, even if we do not push them. Their trajectory is calculated based on the fact that this is a force directed vertically downwards. The curvature of space itself cannot push a body, let alone vertically downwards. Therefore, it seems to me that GTR is devoid of logical meaning and contradicts basic concepts.
 
  • Sad
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy, Dale, Motore and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
Line_112 said:
In my opinion, the curvature of space is geometry, not force. Geometry determines the path along which a body will move, regardless of its speed. It is no coincidence that the theory of relativity speaks of the geometry of space. That is, if we proceed from the general theory of relativity, then a body caught in the curvature of space will simply change its trajectory of motion, regardless of how fast it moves. And if it is initially motionless, then it will remain so. In reality, bodies begin to move vertically downwards, even if we do not push them. Their trajectory is calculated based on the fact that this is a force directed vertically downwards. The curvature of space itself cannot push a body, let alone vertically downwards. Therefore, it seems to me that GTR is devoid of logical meaning and contradicts basic concepts.
In general relativity it is not space but spacetime that is curved. The distinction is crucial because is nothing is motionless in spacetime; we are always moving forward in time at the rate of one second per second.

An excellent illustration of how an object (in this case, an apple) that is motionless in space will start moving vertically downwards as a result of spacetime curvature is(credit to our member @A.T.)

As this thread is based on a misconception about the theory, it is closed.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: L Drago and DaveC426913
Line_112 said:
it seems to me that GTR is devoid of logical meaning and contradicts basic concepts
Just a word of advice. Any time you think something like this of an established scientific discipline, you can immediately know that you are missing something.

In this case you were missing the time part of spacetime. But the point is that scientists are not idiots. We can be wrong, but the ways that we are wrong are much more subtle than this type of criticism.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: L Drago, haushofer, ersmith and 6 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 130 ·
5
Replies
130
Views
15K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K