MHB Buy 7 Pencils & Notebooks with \$15 - Solve Inequalities

  • Thread starter Thread starter rebo1984
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequalities
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around how to allocate $15 to buy pencils and notebooks, with pencils priced at $0.50 each and notebooks at $1.50. An initial calculation suggested buying 7 of each, but it was pointed out that this would leave $1 unspent. The correct approach involves a Diophantine equation, leading to multiple combinations of pencils and notebooks that can be purchased while using the entire budget. Specifically, for each notebook removed from the cart, three pencils can be added, resulting in 11 valid combinations. Understanding the equations and their implications is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
rebo1984
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I have \$15 to buy pencils and notebooks from a bookstore. If pencils are
\$0.50 each and a notebook costs \$1.50, then how many pencils and
notebooks can I buy if I spent all of the money?

I reasoned: .5x+1.5x=15
x= 7.5
So 7 notebooks and 7 pencils.

Is this correct?Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
But, you don't spend all of your money...you will have a dollar left over. So, you could by 9 pencils and 7 notebooks.

If you let $P$ be the number of pencils and $N$ be the number of notebooks, you obtain he Diophantine equation:

$$P+3N=30$$

This has the integer solutions:

$$P=3n$$

$$N=10-n$$

where $$0\le n\le10$$ and $n\in\mathbb{Z}$

This gives you 11 combinations that will work by letting $n$ rage over the integers from 0 to 10.

Another way to look at it is to observe that you could buy 10 notebooks for \$15. Then for every notebook you "put back" you can add 3 pencils to your cart. :)
 
MarkFL said:
But, you don't spend all of your money...you will have a dollar left over. So, you could by 9 pencils and 7 notebooks.

If you let $P$ be the number of pencils and $N$ be the number of notebooks, you obtain he Diophantine equation:

$$P+3N=30$$

This has the integer solutions:

$$P=3n$$

$$N=10-n$$

where $$0\le n\le10$$ and $n\in\mathbb{Z}$

This gives you 11 combinations that will work by letting $n$ rage over the integers from 0 to 10.

Another way to look at it is to observe that you could buy 10 notebooks for \$15. Then for every notebook you "put back" you can add 3 pencils to your cart. :)

Im not sure i understand how you derived those equations and what they mean.
 
rebo1984 said:
Im not sure i understand how you derived those equations and what they mean.

Perhaps you are not familiar with Diophantine Equations... (I didn't learn about them until I got into number theory), but focus instead on my analogy of putting 10 notebooks into your cart. That's one solution, and it will cost all of the \$15 you have. Now, for each notebook you put back, you can replace with 3 pencils, since 3 pencils cost the same as a notebook. So, the 11 possible solutions are:

$$(N,P)=(10,0),\,(9,3),\,(8,6),\,(7,9),\,(6,12),\,(5,15),\,(4,18),\,(3,21),\,(2,24),\,(1,27),\,(0,30)$$

Does that make sense?
 
Yes, that makes sense. And you're right: I'm not familiar with those equations.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top