Compact Hausdorff Spaces: Star-Isomorphic Unital C*-Algebras

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Homeomorphic compact Hausdorff spaces ##X## and ##Y## lead to star-isomorphic unital C*-algebras ##C(X)## and ##C(Y)##. The mapping defined as $$C(h) : C(Y) \rightarrow C(X) \ : \ f \mapsto f \circ h$$ demonstrates linearity through the composition of functions. The discussion clarifies that the properties of vector spaces apply, allowing for the use of composition in place of standard products. The mapping also preserves involution and is shown to be unital, confirming the algebraic structure of the spaces involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compact Hausdorff spaces
  • Familiarity with C*-algebras and their properties
  • Knowledge of vector space axioms
  • Basic concepts of function composition in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of homeomorphic spaces in topology
  • Explore the structure and examples of C*-algebras
  • Learn about the role of involution in C*-algebras
  • Investigate the implications of unital maps in functional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those focused on functional analysis, algebraists, and students studying topology and C*-algebras.

HeinzBor
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
ismorphism between hausdorff compact spaces on C(X) to C(Y)
Relevant Equations
Standard Algebra definitions.
If ##X## and ##Y## are homeomorphic compact Hausdorff spaces, then ##C(X)## and ##C(Y)## are ##star##-isomorphic unital ##C^{*}##-algebras.

So I got the following map to work with

(AND RECALL THAT ##C(X)## and ##C(Y)## are vector spaces).
$$C(h) : C(Y) \rightarrow C(X) \ : \ f \mapsto f \circ h$$
and thus to show linearity (one of the many statements) I must show that
$$((f+ \lambda g) \circ h)(x) = (f \circ h + \lambda g \circ h) (x) \ \ \lambda \in \mathbb{C}, g \in C(Y)$$
However, I am a bit confused on how to work with this mapping, any help is appreciated..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't this simply the definition of the vector space property of ##C(Y)##?
 
fresh_42 said:
Isn't this simply the definition of the vector space property of ##C(Y)##?
Yea I assume I can work with the axioms of a vector space since the functions belong to C(X) and C(Y). However, I haven't had an algebra course for so long, so I am a bit confused on how to work with those definitions, when I have the composition instead of the usual product showing up. Am I allowed to just work with the composition as a standard product in a vector space?
 
You simply have ##h(x)=:y\in Y##. So if you write down the linearity in ##C(Y),## namely the linearity
$$
(f+\lambda \cdot g)(y) := f(y)+ \lambda \cdot g(y),
$$
in a function space, then you get exactly what you need. Only substitute ##y## by ##h(x).##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: HeinzBor
fresh_42 said:
You simply have ##h(x)=:y\in Y##. So if you write down the linearity in ##C(Y),## namely the linearity
$$
(f+\lambda \cdot g)(y) := f(y)+ \lambda \cdot g(y),
$$
in a function space, then you get exactly what you need. Only substitute ##y## by ##h(x).##
Ahhh yes ! of course.. $$X \rightarrow V$$ can be given the structure of a vector space over $$\mathbb{F}$$, if for any $$f,g : X \rightarrow V$$, $$x \in X$$, $$\lambda \in \mathbb{F}$$ $$(f+g)(x) = f(x) + g(x)$$ and $$(\lambda f)(x) = \lambda f(x)$$ and composition is associative..
 
Last edited:
Okay so for linearity:

$$
((f + \lambda g) \circ h)(x) = f((h(x)) + \lambda g (h(x)))
= (f \circ h + \lambda g \circ h)(x)
$$

Multiplicativity:

$$
(f \circ g) ( g \circ h) (x) = f(g \circ h)(x)
= ((fg) \circ h) (x).
$$

To show the mapping preserves involution:

$$
(\overline{f} \circ h)(x) = \overline{f}(x)
= (\overline{f \circ h})(x)
$$Lastly I must show that it is unital i.e.

$$1 h = 1$$, somehow it seems really obvious, but how can h just be gone... $$h$$ was assumed to be a homeomorphism between to compact hausdorff spaces so its 1-1 and has continuous inverse...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K