Calculate Angular Velocity of 70cm Bicycle at 25km/hr

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the angular velocity of a bicycle with a tire diameter of 70 cm traveling at a speed of 25 km/hr. The correct angular velocity is determined to be 19.8 radians per second. The solution involves converting the speed from km/hr to cm/sec, applying the formula for linear velocity, and using the relationship between linear velocity and angular velocity. The standard formula v = rω is highlighted as a more straightforward approach for such calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular velocity and linear velocity concepts
  • Familiarity with the formula v = rω
  • Basic unit conversion skills (km/hr to cm/sec)
  • Knowledge of circular motion and geometry (circumference calculations)
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn more about the relationship between linear and angular velocity using v = rω
  • Explore unit conversion techniques for speed measurements
  • Study the geometry of circles, specifically circumference and radius calculations
  • Investigate practical applications of angular velocity in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of angular velocity and its calculations in practical contexts.

Daaniyaal
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A bicycle with tires 70 cm in diameter is traveling along a road at 25 km/hr. What is the angular velocity in radians per second?
(the answer given in the textbook is 19.8 radians per second)

Homework Equations


A= 1/2r^2 ∅
l = (radius)(central angle)

The Attempt at a Solution


Nvm I figured it out,

You first convert 25 km/h into cm/sec

25,000,00/60/60 = 694.5
Then, we go 2pi * 35 which gives us 219.8
We then divide 694/219.8

Which gives us 3.16

We multiply 3.16 with 2pi

And get 19.8 radians per second.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Daaniyaal! :smile:

That's correct, but why did you divide by π and then multiply by it again later? :redface:

Using the standard formula v = rω is much easier! :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi Daaniyaal! :smile:

That's correct, but why did you divide by π and then multiply by it again later? :redface:

Using the standard formula v = rω is much easier! :smile:

Oh! Thanks! I didn't know the formula when I was doing this question, so I had to think it out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K