Calculate displacement when acceleration is dependent on displacement?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating displacement when acceleration is dependent on displacement, specifically in the context of a force that decreases as the square of the distance from the object. The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to separate acceleration and position for calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest solving a differential equation related to the motion, with one proposing to equate acceleration to a function of velocity and displacement. Others discuss integrating to find relationships between velocity and displacement, and the connection to energy concepts.

Discussion Status

There are multiple approaches being explored, including solving a second-order differential equation and transforming it into a first-order equation. Some participants provide guidance on potential methods without reaching a consensus on a single approach.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is working under the assumption of starting from rest and is looking for a way to express position as a function of time given the specific form of acceleration. There may be constraints related to the integrability and invertibility of the functions involved.

Jasoni22
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I really have no idea where to start with this.

I have a=\frac{2.071\cdot10^{11}A}{mx^{2}} m/s2, where A and m are constants. Since the acceleration is dependent on position, and the position is obviously dependent on acceleration, I don't know how to separate the two in order to do any calculations.

Basically, what I'm trying to do is for any initial position x_{0}, calculate the position at time t of an object being accelerated from rest by a force that is decreasing as the square of the distance from the object.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi.

You should solve the differential equaitond^2 x/dt^2 = C x^-2

Regards.
 
An alternative approach that is often useful when you have a(x) is to note that a=v*dv/dx = 1/2*dv2/dx. Equating that to a(x) and integrating over dx is the source of the concept of kinetic energy and its connection to potential energy, for example. Solving an equation like 1/2*dv2/dx = a(x) is then a first-order differential equation in x, rather than second order in t. You can often get v(x), which is equivalent to calculating the change in potential energy and attributing the change in kinetic energy to it. Once you have v(x), you write v(x) = dx/dt and solve the first-order differential equation in t to get x(t), if all the functions are integrable and invertiable as needed. This way you only have to deal with first-order differential equations that can be solved by integration (if you are lucky). Or, you can just do it sweet_springs' way, if you can see by inspection the function you need. I mention the other way because of its important connection to the concept of conservation of energy, which is merely a shortcut for the math I described.
 
Hi. We are saying the same thing.

2v dv/dt = 2vC x^-2

d (v^2) = 2C x^-2 dx

v^2 = -2C /x + c

v^2 + 2C /x = v0^2 + 2C /x0

Regards.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K